THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs KAMUBHAI BHEMABHAI THAKOR — 167/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBK210001902026

Filing Number

167/2026

Filing Date

09-Feb-2026

Registration No

167/2026

Registration Date

09-Feb-2026

Court

Taluka Court, Lakhni

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11996001250600

Police Station

AGTHALA POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KAMUBHAI BHEMABHAI THAKOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Kamubhai Bhemabhai Thakor (CC 167/2026) The court convicted Kamubhai Bhemabhai Thakor under IPC Section 65(A) for a general offense. Considering mitigating circumstances—the accused's poor economic status, being the sole earning family member, remorse, voluntary confession, and this being a first offense—the court sentenced him to a reduced punishment of Rs. 100 fine instead of the maximum prescribed penalty, emphasizing that lenient sentencing serves justice and societal rehabilitation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 167/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Kamubhai Bhemabhai Thakor (CC 167/2026) The court convicted Kamubhai Bhemabhai Thakor under IPC Section 65(A) for a general offense. Considering mitigating circumstances—the accused's poor economic status, being the sole earning family member, remorse, voluntary confession, and this being a first offense—the court sentenced him to a reduced punishment of Rs. 100 fine instead of the maximum prescribed penalty, emphasizing that lenient sentencing serves justice and societal rehabilitation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case