THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs VISHNUBHAI HASMUKHBHAI PARMAR — 151/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBK210001742026

Filing Number

151/2026

Filing Date

07-Feb-2026

Registration No

151/2026

Registration Date

07-Feb-2026

Court

Taluka Court, Lakhni

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11996001250508

Police Station

AGTHALA POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VISHNUBHAI HASMUKHBHAI PARMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Vishnubhai Hasmukhbhai Parmar (151/2026) The court convicted the respondent under IPC Sections 264 and 285 for causing obstruction on a public road with a vehicle (Registration No. GJ-18-BV-3623) and damaging public property. The accused voluntarily confessed to the offence and pleaded for leniency citing it as a first-time offence and claiming to have a large dependent family. The court sentenced him to two months imprisonment or a fine of Rs. 200, with five days simple imprisonment as an alternative if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 07-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 151/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Vishnubhai Hasmukhbhai Parmar (151/2026) The court convicted the respondent under IPC Sections 264 and 285 for causing obstruction on a public road with a vehicle (Registration No. GJ-18-BV-3623) and damaging public property. The accused voluntarily confessed to the offence and pleaded for leniency citing it as a first-time offence and claiming to have a large dependent family. The court sentenced him to two months imprisonment or a fine of Rs. 200, with five days simple imprisonment as an alternative if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case