THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs MUKESHBHAI GEMRAJI THAKOR — 144/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B,85(1). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBK210001672026

Filing Number

144/2026

Filing Date

07-Feb-2026

Registration No

144/2026

Registration Date

07-Feb-2026

Court

Taluka Court, Lakhni

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11996001260009

Police Station

AGTHALA POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B,85(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MUKESHBHAI GEMRAJI THAKOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted Mukeshbhai Gemraji Thakor under Gujarat Prohibition Act sections 66(1)(b) and 85(1) and sentenced him to imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 100, with 5 days simple imprisonment as default. The court considered mitigating factors including the accused's poor economic status, first offense, family support responsibilities, and genuine remorse, imposing a reduced sentence below the statutory minimum based on established precedent permitting leniency in deserving cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 07-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 144/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted Mukeshbhai Gemraji Thakor under Gujarat Prohibition Act sections 66(1)(b) and 85(1) and sentenced him to imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 100, with 5 days simple imprisonment as default. The court considered mitigating factors including the accused's poor economic status, first offense, family support responsibilities, and genuine remorse, imposing a reduced sentence below the statutory minimum based on established precedent permitting leniency in deserving cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case