THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs LALABHAI TAKHAJI THAKOR — 141/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B,85(1). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBK210001642026

Filing Number

141/2026

Filing Date

07-Feb-2026

Registration No

141/2026

Registration Date

07-Feb-2026

Court

Taluka Court, Lakhni

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11996006251388

Police Station

THARAD POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B,85(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.LALABHAI TAKHAJI THAKOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted respondent Lalabhai Takhaji Thakor under Gujarat Prohibition Act sections 66(1)(b) and 85(1) for unlawful possession and consumption of liquor. The court sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 100 (or 5 days simple imprisonment in default), applying the principle of sentencing discretion based on mitigating circumstances—notably the respondent's impoverished background, status as sole earner, and first-time offense warranting minimal punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 07-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 141/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted respondent Lalabhai Takhaji Thakor under Gujarat Prohibition Act sections 66(1)(b) and 85(1) for unlawful possession and consumption of liquor. The court sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 100 (or 5 days simple imprisonment in default), applying the principle of sentencing discretion based on mitigating circumstances—notably the respondent's impoverished background, status as sole earner, and first-time offense warranting minimal punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case