THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs DINESHBHAI DEVAJI THAKOR — 138/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBK210001602026

Filing Number

138/2026

Filing Date

07-Feb-2026

Registration No

138/2026

Registration Date

07-Feb-2026

Court

Taluka Court, Lakhni

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11996006251204

Police Station

THARAD POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185,3,181

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DINESHBHAI DEVAJI THAKOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted Dineshbhai Devaji Thakor under IPC Sections 185, 336, 337, and Prohibition Act Section 66(1) for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol on 10/12/2025. The court sentenced him to a fine of ₹1,000 (or 5 days simple imprisonment if unpaid), considering the severity of the offense, his voluntary confession, and sentencing principles that favor proportionate punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 07-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 138/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted Dineshbhai Devaji Thakor under IPC Sections 185, 336, 337, and Prohibition Act Section 66(1) for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol on 10/12/2025. The court sentenced him to a fine of ₹1,000 (or 5 days simple imprisonment if unpaid), considering the severity of the offense, his voluntary confession, and sentencing principles that favor proportionate punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case