THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs SHAMLAJI DEHLAJI SOLANKI THAKOR — 134/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B,85(1). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBK210001562026

Filing Number

134/2026

Filing Date

07-Feb-2026

Registration No

134/2026

Registration Date

07-Feb-2026

Court

Taluka Court, Lakhni

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11996001250532

Police Station

AGTHALA POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B,85(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHAMLAJI DEHLAJI SOLANKI THAKOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted respondent Shamlaji Dehlaji Solanki Thakor under Gujarat Prohibition Act sections 66(1)(b) and 85(1) for illegal possession and consumption of liquor. Considering mitigating circumstances—the respondent's impoverished background, status as the sole earner in his family, and this being his first offense—the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine (or 5 days simple imprisonment if fine unpaid), substantially below the statutory minimum, based on established judicial precedent permitting reduced sentences where sufficient grounds exist. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 07-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 134/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted respondent Shamlaji Dehlaji Solanki Thakor under Gujarat Prohibition Act sections 66(1)(b) and 85(1) for illegal possession and consumption of liquor. Considering mitigating circumstances—the respondent's impoverished background, status as the sole earner in his family, and this being his first offense—the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine (or 5 days simple imprisonment if fine unpaid), substantially below the statutory minimum, based on established judicial precedent permitting reduced sentences where sufficient grounds exist. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case