THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs SHAMLAJI DEHLAJI SOLANKI THAKOR — 134/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B,85(1). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBK210001562026
Filing Number
134/2026
Filing Date
07-02-2026
Registration No
134/2026
Registration Date
07-02-2026
Court
Taluka Court, Lakhni
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
11996001250532
Police Station
AGTHALA POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
SHAMLAJI DEHLAJI SOLANKI THAKOR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court convicted respondent Shamlaji Dehlaji Solanki Thakor under Gujarat Prohibition Act sections 66(1)(b) and 85(1) for illegal possession and consumption of liquor. Considering mitigating circumstances—the respondent's impoverished background, status as the sole earner in his family, and this being his first offense—the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine (or 5 days simple imprisonment if fine unpaid), substantially below the statutory minimum, based on established judicial precedent permitting reduced sentences where sufficient grounds exist. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court convicted respondent Shamlaji Dehlaji Solanki Thakor under Gujarat Prohibition Act sections 66(1)(b) and 85(1) for illegal possession and consumption of liquor. Considering mitigating circumstances—the respondent's impoverished background, status as the sole earner in his family, and this being his first offense—the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine (or 5 days simple imprisonment if fine unpaid), substantially below the statutory minimum, based on established judicial precedent permitting reduced sentences where sufficient grounds exist. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts