THAKOR RAJAJI KHEMAJI vs VAGHELA JABARSINH KHEMAJI Advocate - A M JOSHI — 1/2026

Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5. Disposed: Uncontested--WITHDRAWN on 18th April 2026.

Case disposed

CMA SC - CIVIL MISC. APPLICATION - SR/CIVIL/SMALL CAUSE COU

CNR: GJBK210000682026

Filing Number

1/2026

Filing Date

12-Jan-2026

Registration No

1/2026

Registration Date

12-Jan-2026

Court

Taluka Court, Lakhni

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

18-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--WITHDRAWN

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THAKOR RAJAJI KHEMAJI

    Adv. N L KUMRECHA

  2. 2.THAKOR BHOPATAJI KHEMAJI

  3. 3.THAKOR RANAJI KHEMAJI

  4. 4.THAKOR MIRABEN KHEMAJI

  5. 5.THAKOR PRADHANJI KHEMAJI

  6. 6.THAKOR BALVANTJI KHEMAJI

  7. 7.THAKOR PARBATJI KHEMAJI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VAGHELA JABARSINH KHEMAJI Advocate - A M JOSHI

  2. 2.KANBI SHAMLAJI HEMAJI

    Adv. A M JOSHI

  3. 3.KANBI KHUMAJI JORAJI

    Adv. A M JOSHI

  4. 4.KANBI VIRMAJI VARDHAJI

    Adv. A M JOSHI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The court (Magistrate First Class, Lakhnpur) dismissed the accused's application to proceed against the defendant under Section 8 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for failing to pay fine fees required under prescribed procedures. The court ordered the accused to pay the requisite fee to the treasury before the case could proceed further. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 13-Feb-2026

    Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 29-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 12-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court (Magistrate First Class, Lakhnpur) dismissed the accused's application to proceed against the defendant under Section 8 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for failing to pay fine fees required under prescribed procedures. The court ordered the accused to pay the requisite fee to the treasury before the case could proceed further. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case