KALPESHBHAI HAKMABHAI VANKAR vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - D V THAKOR — 71/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 27th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJBK190001652026
Filing Number
71/2026
Filing Date
07-Mar-2026
Registration No
71/2026
Registration Date
07-Mar-2026
Court
ADDL. DISTRICT COURT-Deodar
Judge
1-5th Addl District Judge
Decision Date
27-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 06-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
122
Police Station
DEODAR POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KALPESHBHAI HAKMABHAI VANKAR
Adv. M K PARMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - D V THAKOR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
27-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary The Fifth Additional Sessions Court in Diyodhar, Banaskantha District, rejected the bail application of accused Kalpeshbhai Hakmabhai Vankkar under CrPC Section 483 on March 27, 2026. The court found the accused guilty of serious POCSO Act violations, including luring a minor girl with false promises, repeatedly sexually assaulting her with threats of releasing intimate photos, and intimidating her family. Given the grave nature of the crimes, the victim's minor status, risk of evidence tampering, and danger to the victim due to community ties, the court denied regular bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Mar-2026
Disposed
5th Addl District Judge
-
23-Mar-2026
Order
5th Addl District Judge
-
17-Mar-2026
Order
5th Addl District Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Process To Respondents
5th Addl District Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
Process To Respondents
5th Addl District Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 71/2026
Summary The Fifth Additional Sessions Court in Diyodhar, Banaskantha District, rejected the bail application of accused Kalpeshbhai Hakmabhai Vankkar under CrPC Section 483 on March 27, 2026. The court found the accused guilty of serious POCSO Act violations, including luring a minor girl with false promises, repeatedly sexually assaulting her with threats of releasing intimate photos, and intimidating her family. Given the grave nature of the crimes, the victim's minor status, risk of evidence tampering, and danger to the victim due to community ties, the court denied regular bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts