PINTUBHAI BALAVANTSIH SOLANKI vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - D V THAKOR — 70/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 27th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJBK190001642026
Filing Number
70/2026
Filing Date
07-Mar-2026
Registration No
70/2026
Registration Date
07-Mar-2026
Court
ADDL. DISTRICT COURT-Deodar
Judge
1-5th Addl District Judge
Decision Date
27-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 06-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
135
Police Station
DEODAR POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PINTUBHAI BALAVANTSIH SOLANKI
Adv. T H SOLANKI
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - D V THAKOR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
27-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The court granted regular bail to the accused Pintubhai Balvantsinha Solanki in a case involving charges under BNS sections 189(1)(a), 114(2), 117(2), 120(1), 221, 121(2), and 263(2). The court applied the principle that "bail is the rule and jail is an exception," noting that other co-accused had already been granted bail and that no substantial evidence of tampering with witnesses or fleeing was established on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Mar-2026
Disposed
5th Addl District Judge
-
23-Mar-2026
Order
5th Addl District Judge
-
17-Mar-2026
Order
5th Addl District Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Process To Respondents
5th Addl District Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
Process To Respondents
5th Addl District Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 70/2026
The court granted regular bail to the accused Pintubhai Balvantsinha Solanki in a case involving charges under BNS sections 189(1)(a), 114(2), 117(2), 120(1), 221, 121(2), and 263(2). The court applied the principle that "bail is the rule and jail is an exception," noting that other co-accused had already been granted bail and that no substantial evidence of tampering with witnesses or fleeing was established on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts