Government of Gujarat vs MADARSING PARAMAJI VAGHELA Advocate - R V SOLANKI — 83/2019
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 308,324,323,504,506(2),114,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 08th April 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: GJBK180025332019
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
83/2019
Filing Date
10-12-2019
Registration No
83/2019
Registration Date
10-12-2019
Court
ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, Deesa
Judge
3-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
08th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
106
Police Station
DEESA RURAL POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. V B KANSARA, D P DAVE
Respondent(s)
MADARSING PARAMAJI VAGHELA Advocate - R V SOLANKI
NANSING MADARSING VAGHELA
Adv. R V SOLANKI
RAVATJI JESHAJI VAGHELA
Adv. R V SOLANKI
MAFUJI JESHAJI VAGHELA
Adv. R V SOLANKI
Hearing History
Judge: 3-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 25-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 10-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 05-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 08-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The 6th Additional Sessions Court at Deesa acquitted all four accused (Madarsing Paramaji Vaghela, Nansing Madarsing Vaghela, Ravatji Jeshaji Vaghela, and Mafuji Jeshaji Vaghela) of charges under IPC sections 308, 324, 323, 504, 506(2), and 114 due to insufficient and inconsistent evidence, finding the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The 6th Additional Sessions Court at Deesa acquitted all four accused (Madarsing Paramaji Vaghela, Nansing Madarsing Vaghela, Ravatji Jeshaji Vaghela, and Mafuji Jeshaji Vaghela) of charges under IPC sections 308, 324, 323, 504, 506(2), and 114 due to insufficient and inconsistent evidence, finding the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts