Government of Gujarat vs NARANBHAI BHEMABHAI PATEL Advocate - D.P.CHAUDHARY — 15/2019
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,504,506(2),114,. Status: EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION. Next hearing: 24th April 2026.
ATRO - SPECIAL CASE - ATRO
CNR: GJBK180018512019
Next Hearing
24th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
15/2019
Filing Date
17-07-2019
Registration No
15/2019
Registration Date
17-07-2019
Court
ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, Deesa
Judge
3-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
FIR Details
FIR Number
34
Police Station
DHANERA POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. S K JOSHI
Respondent(s)
NARANBHAI BHEMABHAI PATEL Advocate - D.P.CHAUDHARY
MUKESHBHAI MOHANBHAI PATEL
Adv. D.P.CHAUDHARY
NARASINHBHAI VANABHAI PATEL
Adv. D.P.CHAUDHARY
Hearing History
Judge: 3-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 13-04-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 02-04-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 09-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 27-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 20-11-2025 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Interim Orders
This is a Special Atro (Atrocities) Case No 15/2019 from Gujarat High Court involving allegations of assault and injuries. The court examined the complainant's sworn statement detailing injuries sustained, medical certificates, and cross-examination by the defense. The order affirms that the complainant's testimony regarding the nature and cause of injuries is supported by documentary evidence, and the case proceeds with the recorded statements forming part of the court record for further adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a Special Atro (Atrocities) Case No 15/2019 from Gujarat High Court involving allegations of assault and injuries. The court examined the complainant's sworn statement detailing injuries sustained, medical certificates, and cross-examination by the defense. The order affirms that the complainant's testimony regarding the nature and cause of injuries is supported by documentary evidence, and the case proceeds with the recorded statements forming part of the court record for further adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts