Government of Gujarat vs JUTHAJI SURTAJI RAJPUT Advocate - V A GHASURA — 15/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 143,147,148,149,307,323,325,294(B),506(2),. Status: EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION. Next hearing: 07th July 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: GJBK180016392024
Next Hearing
07th July 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
15/2024
Filing Date
01-07-2024
Registration No
15/2024
Registration Date
01-07-2024
Court
ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, Deesa
Judge
3-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
FIR Details
FIR Number
11195018230754
Police Station
DHANERA POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. V B KANSARA
Respondent(s)
JUTHAJI SURTAJI RAJPUT Advocate - V A GHASURA
DEVAJI SURTAJI RAJPUT
ASHUJI JUTHAJI RAJPUT
JAYSINH @ JESHAJI RAJPUT
VENAJI LAKHAJI RAJPUT
PAHADSINH LAKHAJI RAJPUT
Hearing History
Judge: 3-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 09-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 19-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 17-11-2025 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 02-09-2025 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Interim Orders
The accused's statement has been recorded under Section 313 CrPC in Sessions Case No. 15/2024. The accused denied all charges and claimed the evidence was fabricated by police, stating that he signed documents without understanding their contents and that proper procedures were not followed during the investigation. The court has recorded his detailed examination and oral arguments from both the prosecution and defense counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The accused's statement has been recorded under Section 313 CrPC in Sessions Case No. 15/2024. The accused denied all charges and claimed the evidence was fabricated by police, stating that he signed documents without understanding their contents and that proper procedures were not followed during the investigation. The court has recorded his detailed examination and oral arguments from both the prosecution and defense counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts