Government of Gujarat vs KARMASHIBHAI KHENGARBHAI RABARI Advocate - M.L.DESAI — 8/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294b,323,506(2),114,114,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 25th March 2026.
ATRO - SPECIAL CASE - ATRO
CNR: GJBK180016012021
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
8/2021
Filing Date
20-03-2021
Registration No
8/2021
Registration Date
20-03-2021
Court
ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, Deesa
Judge
3-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
FIR Details
FIR Number
987
Police Station
SHIHORI POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. S K JOSHI
Respondent(s)
KARMASHIBHAI KHENGARBHAI RABARI Advocate - M.L.DESAI
KAMLABEN @ KAMUBEN WIFE OF KARAMSHIBHAI RABARI
Adv. M.L.DESAI
Hearing History
Judge: 3-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 13-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 09-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 02-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 16-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The 6th Sessions Court (Atrocities) at Deesa acquitted the two accused, Karmshibhai Khengaribhai Rabari and Kamlaben Karmshibhai Rabari, of charges under IPC Sections 323, 294(b), 506(2), 114 and SC/ST Act Sections 3(1)(r) and 3(2)(5)(a). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove essential ingredients of the charged offences, particularly lacking proper evidence of criminal intent, insult with intent to humiliate, and public view requirements mandated by Supreme Court precedents on these statutes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The 6th Sessions Court (Atrocities) at Deesa acquitted the two accused, Karmshibhai Khengaribhai Rabari and Kamlaben Karmshibhai Rabari, of charges under IPC Sections 323, 294(b), 506(2), 114 and SC/ST Act Sections 3(1)(r) and 3(2)(5)(a). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove essential ingredients of the charged offences, particularly lacking proper evidence of criminal intent, insult with intent to humiliate, and public view requirements mandated by Supreme Court precedents on these statutes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts