Government of Gujarat vs HANSAJI MAGAJI PUROHIT Advocate - T A TRIVEDI — 47/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 143,147,148,149,324,323,294(b),506(2). Status: Evidence Of Prosecution. Next hearing: 07th July 2026.

Evidence Of Prosecution Next hearing 07-Jul-2026

SC - SESSIONS CASE

CNR: GJBK180015262025

Filing Number

47/2025

Filing Date

17-Jul-2025

Registration No

47/2025

Registration Date

17-Jul-2025

Court

ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, Deesa

Judge

3-6th Addl District Judge

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11195018230755

Police Station

DHANERA POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 143,147,148,149,324,323,294(b),506(2)

Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135

Petitioner(s)

1.Government of Gujarat

Adv. S K JOSHI

Respondent(s)

1.HANSAJI MAGAJI PUROHIT Advocate - T A TRIVEDI
2.HITESHBHAI (HITENDRAKUMAR) HANSAJI PUROHIT

Adv. T A TRIVEDI
3.SITABEN HANSAJI MAGAJI PUROHIT

Adv. T A TRIVEDI
4.BHAVNABEN HANSAJI PUROHIT

Adv. T A TRIVEDI
5.GITABEN D/O HANSAJI PUROHIT

Adv. T A TRIVEDI
6.VARSHABEN HITESHBHAI HANSAJI PUROHIT

Adv. T A TRIVEDI

Case History

07-Jul-2026

Next hearingPending
15-Apr-2026

OrderView PDF
15-Apr-2026

OrderView PDF

This document is a Sessions Court order (No. 47/2025) in Gujarati containing the accused's sworn statement regarding alleged irregularities in the investigation, including claims about fabricated evidence and procedural violations. The order records the accused's allegations that the police conducted an improper panchnama (witness procedure) without proper authorization and collected evidence improperly. However, the actual court order/judgment on the case outcome is incomplete or not clearly presented in this document — the text appears to cut off before the judge's final ruling on bail, conviction, or case disposition is stated. SKIP — The document does not contain a clear final order (bail granted/denied, petition allowed/dismissed, etc.). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
15-Apr-2026

Evidence Of Prosecution

6th Addl District Judge
09-Mar-2026

Evidence Of Prosecution

6th Addl District Judge
19-Jan-2026

OrderView PDF
19-Jan-2026

Evidence Of Prosecution

6th Addl District Judge
17-Nov-2025

Evidence Of Prosecution

6th Addl District Judge
02-Sep-2025

Evidence Of Prosecution

6th Addl District Judge
28-Aug-2025

Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution

6th Addl District Judge
28-Jul-2025

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
17-Jul-2025

Case filed

Registration No. 47/2025

casestatus.in Summary

This document is a Sessions Court order (No. 47/2025) in Gujarati containing the accused's sworn statement regarding alleged irregularities in the investigation, including claims about fabricated evidence and procedural violations. The order records the accused's allegations that the police conducted an improper panchnama (witness procedure) without proper authorization and collected evidence improperly. However, the actual court order/judgment on the case outcome is incomplete or not clearly presented in this document — the text appears to cut off before the judge's final ruling on bail, conviction, or case disposition is stated. SKIP — The document does not contain a clear final order (bail granted/denied, petition allowed/dismissed, etc.). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.