Government of Gujarat vs HANSAJI MAGAJI PUROHIT Advocate - T A TRIVEDI — 47/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 143,147,148,149,324,323,294(b),506(2),. Status: EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION. Next hearing: 07th July 2026.

SC - SESSIONS CASE

CNR: GJBK180015262025

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Next Hearing

07th July 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

47/2025

Filing Date

17-07-2025

Registration No

47/2025

Registration Date

17-07-2025

Court

ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, Deesa

Judge

3-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

FIR Details

FIR Number

11195018230755

Police Station

DHANERA POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 143,147,148,149,324,323,294(b),506(2),
GUJARAT (BOMBAY) POLICE ACT, 1951 Section 135,

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. S K JOSHI

Respondent(s)

HANSAJI MAGAJI PUROHIT Advocate - T A TRIVEDI

HITESHBHAI (HITENDRAKUMAR) HANSAJI PUROHIT

Adv. T A TRIVEDI

SITABEN HANSAJI MAGAJI PUROHIT

Adv. T A TRIVEDI

BHAVNABEN HANSAJI PUROHIT

Adv. T A TRIVEDI

GITABEN D/O HANSAJI PUROHIT

Adv. T A TRIVEDI

VARSHABEN HITESHBHAI HANSAJI PUROHIT

Adv. T A TRIVEDI

Hearing History

Judge: 3-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

15-04-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

09-03-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

19-01-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

17-11-2025

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

02-09-2025

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Interim Orders

19-01-2026
ORDER
15-04-2026
ORDER
15-04-2026
ORDER

This document is a Sessions Court order (No. 47/2025) in Gujarati containing the accused's sworn statement regarding alleged irregularities in the investigation, including claims about fabricated evidence and procedural violations. The order records the accused's allegations that the police conducted an improper panchnama (witness procedure) without proper authorization and collected evidence improperly. However, the actual court order/judgment on the case outcome is incomplete or not clearly presented in this document — the text appears to cut off before the judge's final ruling on bail, conviction, or case disposition is stated. SKIP — The document does not contain a clear final order (bail granted/denied, petition allowed/dismissed, etc.). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This document is a Sessions Court order (No. 47/2025) in Gujarati containing the accused's sworn statement regarding alleged irregularities in the investigation, including claims about fabricated evidence and procedural violations. The order records the accused's allegations that the police conducted an improper panchnama (witness procedure) without proper authorization and collected evidence improperly. However, the actual court order/judgment on the case outcome is incomplete or not clearly presented in this document — the text appears to cut off before the judge's final ruling on bail, conviction, or case disposition is stated. SKIP — The document does not contain a clear final order (bail granted/denied, petition allowed/dismissed, etc.). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, Deesa All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case