Government of Gujarat vs MAHESHBHAI GANDABHAI PARMAR Advocate - S M CHAUDHARY — 55/2022
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 209,. Status: EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: GJBK180015072022
Next Hearing
09th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
55/2022
Filing Date
16-09-2022
Registration No
55/2022
Registration Date
16-09-2022
Court
ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, Deesa
Judge
3-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
FIR Details
FIR Number
11195051220373
Police Station
THARA POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. V B KANSARA, S P NAI
Respondent(s)
MAHESHBHAI GANDABHAI PARMAR Advocate - S M CHAUDHARY
Hearing History
Judge: 3-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 01-04-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 10-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 29-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 06-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Interim Orders
Summary: In Sessions Case No. 55/2022, the court recorded the testimony of a witness (Saheb No. 05) who identified clothing and articles seized from the accused during a police investigation. The witness authenticated various exhibits including t-shirts, jeans, pants, and an underwear with identifying marks, confirming these items were seized in his presence and sealed by police. The court found no grounds for appeal and directed that the authenticated documents be recorded in the case file for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In Sessions Case No. 55/2022, the court recorded the testimony of a witness (Saheb No. 05) who identified clothing and articles seized from the accused during a police investigation. The witness authenticated various exhibits including t-shirts, jeans, pants, and an underwear with identifying marks, confirming these items were seized in his presence and sealed by police. The court found no grounds for appeal and directed that the authenticated documents be recorded in the case file for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts