Government of Gujarat vs MAHESHBHAI GANDABHAI PARMAR Advocate - S M CHAUDHARY — 55/2022
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 209. Status: Evidence Of Prosecution. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: GJBK180015072022
Filing Number
55/2022
Filing Date
16-Sep-2022
Registration No
55/2022
Registration Date
16-Sep-2022
Court
ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, Deesa
Judge
3-6th Addl District Judge
Last updated 06-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11195051220373
Police Station
THARA POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. V B KANSARA, S P NAI
Respondent(s)
-
1.MAHESHBHAI GANDABHAI PARMAR Advocate - S M CHAUDHARY
Case History
-
09-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
30-Apr-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
6th Addl District Judge
-
01-Apr-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
6th Addl District Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
-
10-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary: In Sessions Case No. 55/2022, the court recorded the testimony of a witness (Saheb No. 05) who identified clothing and articles seized from the accused during a police investigation. The witness authenticated various exhibits including t-shirts, jeans, pants, and an underwear with identifying marks, confirming these items were seized in his presence and sealed by police. The court found no grounds for appeal and directed that the authenticated documents be recorded in the case file for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
6th Addl District Judge
-
29-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
6th Addl District Judge
-
06-Jan-2026
OrderView PDF
-
06-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
6th Addl District Judge
-
25-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
6th Addl District Judge
-
01-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
6th Addl District Judge
-
09-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
6th Addl District Judge
-
26-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
6th Addl District Judge
-
18-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
6th Addl District Judge
-
11-Jul-2025
OrderView PDF
-
11-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
6th Addl District Judge
-
16-Jun-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
7th Addl District Judge
-
12-May-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
01-Apr-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
01-Mar-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
10-Jan-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
13-Dec-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
13-Nov-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
05-Oct-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
05-Sep-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
05-Aug-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl District Judge
-
08-May-2024
Hearing On Framing Of Charge/Discharge Application
4th Addl District Judge
-
17-Feb-2024
Hearing On Framing Of Charge/Discharge Application
4th Addl District Judge
-
22-Nov-2023
Hearing On Framing Of Charge/Discharge Application
4th Addl District Judge
-
11-Sep-2023
Hearing On Framing Of Charge/Discharge Application
4th Addl District Judge
-
26-Jul-2023
Hearing On Framing Of Charge/Discharge Application
4th Addl District Judge
-
26-Jun-2023
Hearing On Framing Of Charge/Discharge Application
4th Addl District Judge
-
09-May-2023
Hearing On Framing Of Charge/Discharge Application
2nd Addl District Judge
-
05-Apr-2023
Hearing On Framing Of Charge/Discharge Application
2nd Addl District Judge
-
13-Mar-2023
Hearing On Framing Of Charge/Discharge Application
2nd Addl District Judge
-
24-Jan-2023
Hearing On Framing Of Charge/Discharge Application
2nd Addl District Judge
-
19-Dec-2022
Hearing On Framing Of Charge/Discharge Application
2nd Addl District Judge
-
16-Nov-2022
Hearing On Framing Of Charge/Discharge Application
2nd Addl District Judge
-
29-Sep-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Sep-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 55/2022
Summary: In Sessions Case No. 55/2022, the court recorded the testimony of a witness (Saheb No. 05) who identified clothing and articles seized from the accused during a police investigation. The witness authenticated various exhibits including t-shirts, jeans, pants, and an underwear with identifying marks, confirming these items were seized in his presence and sealed by police. The court found no grounds for appeal and directed that the authenticated documents be recorded in the case file for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts