Government of Gujarat vs SAGARBHAI AMARATBHAI VARECHA Advocate - D I CONTRACTOR — 13/2021

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 302,404,201. Status: EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.

SC - SESSIONS CASE

CNR: GJBK180012122021

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Next Hearing

25th June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

13/2021

Filing Date

19-01-2021

Registration No

13/2021

Registration Date

19-01-2021

Court

ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, Deesa

Judge

3-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

FIR Details

FIR Number

891

Police Station

DEESA RURAL POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 302,404,201
GUJARAT (BOMBAY) POLICE ACT, 1951 Section 135

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. V B KANSARA

Respondent(s)

SAGARBHAI AMARATBHAI VARECHA Advocate - D I CONTRACTOR

Hearing History

Judge: 3-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

08-04-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

09-03-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

19-01-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

17-11-2025

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

02-09-2025

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Interim Orders

02-09-2025
ORDER
17-11-2025
ORDER
08-04-2026
ORDER

Summary In Sessions Case No 13/2021, the court rejected the accused's counter-examination petition. The accused challenged the authenticity of evidence allegedly recovered during police custody, claiming procedural irregularities in the panchnama (witness statement) and questioning the validity of seized items. The court found no merit in these objections and upheld the prosecution's evidence, allowing the case to proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In Sessions Case No 13/2021, the court rejected the accused's counter-examination petition. The accused challenged the authenticity of evidence allegedly recovered during police custody, claiming procedural irregularities in the panchnama (witness statement) and questioning the validity of seized items. The court found no merit in these objections and upheld the prosecution's evidence, allowing the case to proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, Deesa All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case