Government of Gujarat vs SANJAYBHAI SOMABHAI RAVAL Advocate - D S PARMAR — 15/2020

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,323,294B,506(2),114,. Status: EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION. Next hearing: 09th July 2026.

ATRO - SPECIAL CASE - ATRO

CNR: GJBK180010352020

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Next Hearing

09th July 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

15/2020

Filing Date

11-09-2020

Registration No

15/2020

Registration Date

11-09-2020

Court

ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, Deesa

Judge

3-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

FIR Details

FIR Number

216

Police Station

DEESA RURAL POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 324,323,294B,506(2),114,
SCHEDULED CASTS AND THE SCHEDULED TRIBES (PREVENTION OF TROCITIES) ACT, 1989 Section 3(1)(R)(S),3(2)5,A

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. S K JOSHI

Respondent(s)

SANJAYBHAI SOMABHAI RAVAL Advocate - D S PARMAR

SAGARBHAI SOMABHAI RAVAL

Adv. D S PARMAR

Hearing History

Judge: 3-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

20-04-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

09-03-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

13-01-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

11-11-2025

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

26-08-2025

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Interim Orders

11-11-2025
ORDER
11-11-2025
ORDER
11-11-2025
ORDER
11-11-2025
ORDER
13-01-2026
ORDER
13-01-2026
ORDER
09-03-2026
ORDER
09-03-2026
ORDER

This is a Special Atrocity Case No 15/2020 from a Gujarati court involving an FIR statement and examination. The court examined the complainant's testimony regarding allegations of assault and intimidation. The court upheld the witness examination, rejected claims of improper investigation procedure, and found the statement recorded by the investigating officer to be proper. The case proceeded based on the examination findings dated 08/03/2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This is a Special Atrocity Case No 15/2020 from a Gujarati court involving an FIR statement and examination. The court examined the complainant's testimony regarding allegations of assault and intimidation. The court upheld the witness examination, rejected claims of improper investigation procedure, and found the statement recorded by the investigating officer to be proper. The case proceeded based on the examination findings dated 08/03/2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, Deesa All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case