Government of Gujarat vs CHETANBHAI DHIRAJI PUROHIT Advocate - M R CHAUDHARI — 14/2020
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 302,364,143,120B,149,342,323,. Status: EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION. Next hearing: 06th July 2026.
ATRO - SPECIAL CASE - ATRO
CNR: GJBK180010342020
Next Hearing
06th July 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
14/2020
Filing Date
11-09-2020
Registration No
14/2020
Registration Date
11-09-2020
Court
ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, Deesa
Judge
3-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
FIR Details
FIR Number
669
Police Station
DHANERA POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. S K JOSHI
Respondent(s)
CHETANBHAI DHIRAJI PUROHIT Advocate - M R CHAUDHARI
RAMABHAI BABUJI PUROHIT
Adv. M R CHAUDHARI
HANSARAJBHAI CHAMANAJI PUROHIT
Adv. M R CHAUDHARI
RAMABHAI KAPURAJI PUROHIT
Adv. M R CHAUDHARI
KIRTIBHAI MOHANBHAI PUROHIT
Adv. M R CHAUDHARI
GAUTAMBHAI JAYDEVBHAI PUROHIT
Adv. M R CHAUDHARI
Hearing History
Judge: 3-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 20-04-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 09-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 12-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 10-11-2025 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 01-09-2025 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Special Atro Case No. 14/2020 - This is a criminal case involving examination of the accused's statement regarding alleged murder. The court examined the accused's testimony regarding seized evidence (clothing and other items) and cross-examined claims about the crime scene. The court found the accused's explanation regarding the evidence unconvincing and upheld the charges, denying relief sought by the accused. The case has been posted for further proceedings before the competent authority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Special Atro Case No. 14/2020 - This is a criminal case involving examination of the accused's statement regarding alleged murder. The court examined the accused's testimony regarding seized evidence (clothing and other items) and cross-examined claims about the crime scene. The court found the accused's explanation regarding the evidence unconvincing and upheld the charges, denying relief sought by the accused. The case has been posted for further proceedings before the competent authority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts