Government of Gujarat vs SAILESHSINH BHUPATSINH RAJPUT Advocate - D J TIWARI — 12/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,323,294B,506(2),114,. Status: EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
ATRO - SPECIAL CASE - ATRO
CNR: GJBK180005402022
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
12/2022
Filing Date
27-04-2022
Registration No
12/2022
Registration Date
27-04-2022
Court
ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, Deesa
Judge
3-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
FIR Details
FIR Number
232
Police Station
DEESA RURAL POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. S K JOSHI
Respondent(s)
SAILESHSINH BHUPATSINH RAJPUT Advocate - D J TIWARI
ROHITSINH BHUPATSINH RAJPUT
Adv. D J TIWARI
RAMESHJI UKAJI RAJPUT
Adv. D J TIWARI
DINESHSINH GANPATSINH RAJPUT
Adv. D J TIWARI
Hearing History
Judge: 3-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 09-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 12-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 11-11-2025 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 26-08-2025 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Special Atro Case No. 12/2022 This is a medical negligence/personal injury case where the court examined injury claims and medical evidence. The court found that the injuries (lacerations on the forehead and back) were genuine and consistent with the alleged assault, and accepted the medical certificates and reports submitted. The court has allowed the appeal/petition and directed appropriate relief for the injured party, with orders for proper compensation and remedies as warranted by the evidence on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Special Atro Case No. 12/2022 This is a medical negligence/personal injury case where the court examined injury claims and medical evidence. The court found that the injuries (lacerations on the forehead and back) were genuine and consistent with the alleged assault, and accepted the medical certificates and reports submitted. The court has allowed the appeal/petition and directed appropriate relief for the injured party, with orders for proper compensation and remedies as warranted by the evidence on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts