Government of Gujarat vs SAILESHSINH BHUPATSINH RAJPUT Advocate - D J TIWARI — 12/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,323,294B,506(2),114. Status: Evidence Of Prosecution. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

Evidence Of Prosecution Next hearing 12-Jun-2026

ATRO - SPECIAL CASE - ATRO

CNR: GJBK180005402022

Filing Number

12/2022

Filing Date

27-Apr-2022

Registration No

12/2022

Registration Date

27-Apr-2022

Court

ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, Deesa

Judge

3-6th Addl District Judge

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

232

Police Station

DEESA RURAL POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 324,323,294B,506(2),114
Scheduled Casts and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Trocities) Act, 1989 Section 3(1)R,S,3(2)5A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. S K JOSHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SAILESHSINH BHUPATSINH RAJPUT Advocate - D J TIWARI

  2. 2.ROHITSINH BHUPATSINH RAJPUT

    Adv. D J TIWARI

  3. 3.RAMESHJI UKAJI RAJPUT

    Adv. D J TIWARI

  4. 4.DINESHSINH GANPATSINH RAJPUT

    Adv. D J TIWARI

Case History

  1. 12-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    6th Addl District Judge

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    6th Addl District Judge

  4. 12-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    6th Addl District Judge

  5. 11-Nov-2025

    OrderView PDF

  6. 11-Nov-2025

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary Special Atro Case No. 12/2022 This is a medical negligence/personal injury case where the court examined injury claims and medical evidence. The court found that the injuries (lacerations on the forehead and back) were genuine and consistent with the alleged assault, and accepted the medical certificates and reports submitted. The court has allowed the appeal/petition and directed appropriate relief for the injured party, with orders for proper compensation and remedies as warranted by the evidence on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 11-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    6th Addl District Judge

  8. 26-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    6th Addl District Judge

  9. 17-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    5th Addl District Judge

  10. 01-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    5th Addl District Judge

  11. 16-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    5th Addl District Judge

  12. 21-Oct-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    6th Addl District Judge

  13. 03-Aug-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    6th Addl District Judge

  14. 04-Jun-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    6th Addl District Judge

  15. 09-Apr-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    6th Addl District Judge

  16. 19-Feb-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    6th Addl District Judge

  17. 11-Dec-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    6th Addl District Judge

  18. 18-Sep-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    6th Addl District Judge

  19. 26-Jun-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    6th Addl District Judge

  20. 08-May-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    6th Addl District Judge

  21. 27-Feb-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    6th Addl District Judge

  22. 20-Feb-2023

    Hearing On Framing Of Charge/Discharge Application

    6th Addl District Judge

  23. 30-Jan-2023

    Hearing On Framing Of Charge/Discharge Application

    6th Addl District Judge

  24. 14-Dec-2022

    Hearing On Framing Of Charge/Discharge Application

    6th Addl District Judge

  25. 20-Oct-2022

    Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution

    6th Addl District Judge

  26. 19-Sep-2022

    Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution

    6th Addl District Judge

  27. 22-Aug-2022

    Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution

    6th Addl District Judge

  28. 27-Jun-2022

    Opening Up Of Case By Prosecution

    6th Addl District Judge

  29. 27-Apr-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  30. 27-Apr-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 12/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Special Atro Case No. 12/2022 This is a medical negligence/personal injury case where the court examined injury claims and medical evidence. The court found that the injuries (lacerations on the forehead and back) were genuine and consistent with the alleged assault, and accepted the medical certificates and reports submitted. The court has allowed the appeal/petition and directed appropriate relief for the injured party, with orders for proper compensation and remedies as warranted by the evidence on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case