DIPAK NARESHBHAI THAKKAR vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - S K JOSHI — 36/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 438. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

CR RA - CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION

CNR: GJBK180005092026

Filing Number

36/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

36/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, Deesa

Judge

3-6th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11195019251120

Police Station

DEESA RURAL POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 438
Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(e),116(b),98(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DIPAK NARESHBHAI THAKKAR

    Adv. D J TIWARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - S K JOSHI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary The 6th Additional Sessions Court at Deesa allowed the criminal revision application and ordered the release of vehicle GJ 01 RW 7551, which was seized in a Prohibition Act case. The court found the trial court's rejection of interim custody release was erroneous, noting that no confiscation proceedings had been initiated despite 149 days passing since seizure, and relied on recent Gujarat High Court precedents permitting vehicle release with stringent conditions including surety bonds and undertakings not to transfer the vehicle pending trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    6th Addl District Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 36/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The 6th Additional Sessions Court at Deesa allowed the criminal revision application and ordered the release of vehicle GJ 01 RW 7551, which was seized in a Prohibition Act case. The court found the trial court's rejection of interim custody release was erroneous, noting that no confiscation proceedings had been initiated despite 149 days passing since seizure, and relied on recent Gujarat High Court precedents permitting vehicle release with stringent conditions including surety bonds and undertakings not to transfer the vehicle pending trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case