DIPAK NARESHBHAI THAKKAR vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - S K JOSHI — 36/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 438,. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th March 2026.

CR RA - CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION

CNR: GJBK180005092026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

36/2026

Filing Date

05-03-2026

Registration No

36/2026

Registration Date

05-03-2026

Court

ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, Deesa

Judge

3-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

11195019251120

Police Station

DEESA RURAL POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 438,
GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65(a)(e),116(b),98(2),

Petitioner(s)

DIPAK NARESHBHAI THAKKAR

Adv. D J TIWARI

Respondent(s)

Government of Gujarat Advocate - S K JOSHI

Hearing History

Judge: 3-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

10-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The 6th Additional Sessions Court at Deesa allowed the criminal revision application and ordered the release of vehicle GJ 01 RW 7551, which was seized in a Prohibition Act case. The court found the trial court's rejection of interim custody release was erroneous, noting that no confiscation proceedings had been initiated despite 149 days passing since seizure, and relied on recent Gujarat High Court precedents permitting vehicle release with stringent conditions including surety bonds and undertakings not to transfer the vehicle pending trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The 6th Additional Sessions Court at Deesa allowed the criminal revision application and ordered the release of vehicle GJ 01 RW 7551, which was seized in a Prohibition Act case. The court found the trial court's rejection of interim custody release was erroneous, noting that no confiscation proceedings had been initiated despite 149 days passing since seizure, and relied on recent Gujarat High Court precedents permitting vehicle release with stringent conditions including surety bonds and undertakings not to transfer the vehicle pending trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, Deesa All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case