MAHENDRAKUMAR MOHANLAL SOLANKI vs SHARVANBHAI AMABJI MAJIRANA PRO. OF MANISH TREDING CO. Advocate - D S SHUKLA — 47/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415(3). Disposed: Uncontested--COMPROMISED on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: GJBK180003812026

Filing Number

47/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

47/2026

Registration Date

02-Mar-2026

Court

ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, Deesa

Judge

3-6th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--COMPROMISED

Last updated 06-May-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415(3)
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAHENDRAKUMAR MOHANLAL SOLANKI

    Adv. M G TANK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHARVANBHAI AMABJI MAJIRANA PRO. OF MANISH TREDING CO. Advocate - D S SHUKLA

  2. 2.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. S K JOSHI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The 6th Additional Sessions Court at Deesa set aside the trial court's conviction order in this Negotiable Instruments Act case on condition that the accused pays Rs. 80,000 to the complainant by May 19, 2026, following a compromise between parties. If payment fails, the conviction and imprisonment sentence will be automatically restored, with compensation adjusted for amounts already paid under the settlement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    6th Addl District Judge

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Final Hearing

    6th Addl District Judge

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Urgent Hearing

    6th Addl District Judge

  6. 02-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 47/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The 6th Additional Sessions Court at Deesa set aside the trial court's conviction order in this Negotiable Instruments Act case on condition that the accused pays Rs. 80,000 to the complainant by May 19, 2026, following a compromise between parties. If payment fails, the conviction and imprisonment sentence will be automatically restored, with compensation adjusted for amounts already paid under the settlement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case