Government of Gujarat vs VIJUBHA PUNSING VAGHELA- DARBAR Advocate - B.B.MAIDH — 8/2020

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 394,323,294B,114. Status: Evidence Of Prosecution. Next hearing: 21st July 2026.

Evidence Of Prosecution Next hearing 21-Jul-2026 this date has passed

ATRO - SPECIAL CASE - ATRO

CNR: GJBK180003522020

Filing Number

8/2020

Filing Date

05-Mar-2020

Registration No

8/2020

Registration Date

05-Mar-2020

Court

ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, Deesa

Judge

3-6th Addl District Judge

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

164

Police Station

DEESA RURAL POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2019

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 394,323,294B,114
Scheduled Casts and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Trocities) Act, 1989 Section 3(1)(R)(S),3(2)5,(A),3(2)5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. S K JOSHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VIJUBHA PUNSING VAGHELA- DARBAR Advocate - B.B.MAIDH

Case History

  1. 21-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 23-Apr-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    6th Addl District Judge

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    6th Addl District Judge

  4. 13-Jan-2026

    OrderView PDF

  5. 13-Jan-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: In Special Atro Case No 08/2020, the court rejected the accused's plea for relief. The court found no merit in the accused's cross-examination arguments and dismissed the application for witness examination support. The case proceeded with examination of the complainant's witness, and the court ruled that no special relief was warranted in this matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 13-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    6th Addl District Judge

  7. 12-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    6th Addl District Judge

  8. 28-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    6th Addl District Judge

  9. 21-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    5th Addl District Judge

  10. 03-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    5th Addl District Judge

  11. 15-Mar-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    5th Addl District Judge

  12. 18-Dec-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    6th Addl District Judge

  13. 06-Nov-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    6th Addl District Judge

  14. 12-Aug-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    6th Addl District Judge

  15. 11-Jun-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    6th Addl District Judge

  16. 02-Apr-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    6th Addl District Judge

  17. 06-Feb-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    6th Addl District Judge

  18. 21-Nov-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    6th Addl District Judge

  19. 05-Sep-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    6th Addl District Judge

  20. 11-Jul-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    6th Addl District Judge

  21. 16-May-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    6th Addl District Judge

  22. 11-Apr-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    6th Addl District Judge

  23. 31-Jan-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    6th Addl District Judge

  24. 15-Dec-2022

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    6th Addl District Judge

  25. 17-Nov-2022

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    6th Addl District Judge

  26. 12-Oct-2022

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    6th Addl District Judge

  27. 03-Aug-2022

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    6th Addl District Judge

  28. 06-Jul-2022

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    6th Addl District Judge

  29. 25-May-2022

    Framing Of Charge/Plea

    6th Addl District Judge

  30. 22-Mar-2022

    Framing Of Charge/Plea

    4th Addl District Judge

  31. 20-Jan-2022

    Framing Of Charge/Plea

    4th Addl District Judge

  32. 24-Nov-2021

    Framing Of Charge/Plea

    4th Addl District Judge

  33. 13-Sep-2021

    Framing Of Charge/Plea

    4th Addl District Judge

  34. 01-Jul-2021

    Framing Of Charge/Plea

    4th Addl District Judge

  35. 12-Apr-2021

    Process To Accused

    4th Addl District Judge

  36. 16-Dec-2020

    Process To Accused

    4th Addl District Judge

  37. 15-Sep-2020

    Process To Accused

    4th Addl District Judge

  38. 31-Jul-2020

    Process To Accused

    4th Addl District Judge

  39. 22-Jun-2020

    Process To Accused

    4th Addl District Judge

  40. 11-May-2020

    Process To Accused

    3rd Addl District Judge

  41. 06-Apr-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  42. 05-Mar-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 8/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Special Atro Case No 08/2020, the court rejected the accused's plea for relief. The court found no merit in the accused's cross-examination arguments and dismissed the application for witness examination support. The case proceeded with examination of the complainant's witness, and the court ruled that no special relief was warranted in this matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case