Government of Gujarat vs LAJPATRAI MOTIRAM MEHESWARI Advocate - I L DESAI — 6/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,294B,114. Status: EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION. Next hearing: 20th July 2026.

ATRO - SPECIAL CASE - ATRO

CNR: GJBK180002852022

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Next Hearing

20th July 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

6/2022

Filing Date

07-03-2022

Registration No

6/2022

Registration Date

07-03-2022

Court

ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, Deesa

Judge

3-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

FIR Details

FIR Number

34

Police Station

DHANERA POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 323,294B,114
GUJARAT SCHEDULED CASTES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ACT, 1985 Section 3(1)RS,3(2),5-A,

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. S K JOSHI, D I CONTRACTOR

Respondent(s)

LAJPATRAI MOTIRAM MEHESWARI Advocate - I L DESAI

RAHULBHAI @ RAJNIKANT LAJPATRAI MOTIRAM MAHESHWARI

Adv. I L DESAI

SONAJI DASHRATHJI THAKOR

Adv. I L DESAI

KAMLESHKUMAR AMARATJI MAKWANA ( THAKOR )

Adv. I L DESAI

Hearing History

Judge: 3-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

23-04-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

10-03-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

20-01-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

12-11-2025

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

01-09-2025

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Interim Orders

12-11-2025
ORDER
20-01-2026
ORDER
10-03-2026
ORDER

Summary In Special Atro Case No 06/2022, the court rejected the accused's plea of false implication and fabricated evidence. The court found that the physical examination panchnama and seizure records of the accused were properly conducted and documented with the accused's signature. The petition was dismissed, and the case was directed to proceed to the next stage of trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In Special Atro Case No 06/2022, the court rejected the accused's plea of false implication and fabricated evidence. The court found that the physical examination panchnama and seizure records of the accused were properly conducted and documented with the accused's signature. The petition was dismissed, and the case was directed to proceed to the next stage of trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, Deesa All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case