Government of Gujarat vs LAJPATRAI MOTIRAM MEHESWARI Advocate - I L DESAI — 6/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,294B,114. Status: Evidence Of Prosecution. Next hearing: 20th July 2026.

Evidence Of Prosecution Next hearing 20-Jul-2026 this date has passed

ATRO - SPECIAL CASE - ATRO

CNR: GJBK180002852022

Filing Number

6/2022

Filing Date

07-Mar-2022

Registration No

6/2022

Registration Date

07-Mar-2022

Court

ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, Deesa

Judge

3-6th Addl District Judge

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

34

Police Station

DHANERA POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 323,294B,114
Gujarat Scheduled Castes Development Corporation Act, 1985 Section 3(1)RS,3(2),5-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. S K JOSHI, D I CONTRACTOR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.LAJPATRAI MOTIRAM MEHESWARI Advocate - I L DESAI

  2. 2.RAHULBHAI @ RAJNIKANT LAJPATRAI MOTIRAM MAHESHWARI

    Adv. I L DESAI

  3. 3.SONAJI DASHRATHJI THAKOR

    Adv. I L DESAI

  4. 4.KAMLESHKUMAR AMARATJI MAKWANA ( THAKOR )

    Adv. I L DESAI

Case History

  1. 20-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 23-Apr-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    6th Addl District Judge

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary In Special Atro Case No 06/2022, the court rejected the accused's plea of false implication and fabricated evidence. The court found that the physical examination panchnama and seizure records of the accused were properly conducted and documented with the accused's signature. The petition was dismissed, and the case was directed to proceed to the next stage of trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    6th Addl District Judge

  5. 20-Jan-2026

    OrderView PDF

  6. 20-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    6th Addl District Judge

  7. 12-Nov-2025

    OrderView PDF

  8. 12-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    6th Addl District Judge

  9. 01-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    6th Addl District Judge

  10. 21-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    6th Addl District Judge

  11. 07-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    5th Addl District Judge

  12. 17-Feb-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    5th Addl District Judge

  13. 20-Nov-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    6th Addl District Judge

  14. 03-Sep-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    6th Addl District Judge

  15. 18-Jun-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    6th Addl District Judge

  16. 02-Apr-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    6th Addl District Judge

  17. 13-Feb-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    6th Addl District Judge

  18. 02-Jan-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    6th Addl District Judge

  19. 17-Oct-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    6th Addl District Judge

  20. 08-Aug-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    6th Addl District Judge

  21. 30-May-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    6th Addl District Judge

  22. 21-Mar-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    6th Addl District Judge

  23. 14-Mar-2023

    Framing Of Charge/Plea

    6th Addl District Judge

  24. 02-Mar-2023

    Framing Of Charge/Plea

    6th Addl District Judge

  25. 09-Feb-2023

    Framing Of Charge/Plea

    6th Addl District Judge

  26. 29-Dec-2022

    Framing Of Charge/Plea

    6th Addl District Judge

  27. 29-Nov-2022

    Framing Of Charge/Plea

    6th Addl District Judge

  28. 02-Nov-2022

    Framing Of Charge/Plea

    6th Addl District Judge

  29. 17-Aug-2022

    Framing Of Charge/Plea

    6th Addl District Judge

  30. 22-Jun-2022

    Framing Of Charge/Plea

    6th Addl District Judge

  31. 30-May-2022

    Framing Of Charge/Plea

    6th Addl District Judge

  32. 28-Mar-2022

    Framing Of Charge/Plea

    4th Addl District Judge

  33. 07-Mar-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  34. 07-Mar-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 6/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In Special Atro Case No 06/2022, the court rejected the accused's plea of false implication and fabricated evidence. The court found that the physical examination panchnama and seizure records of the accused were properly conducted and documented with the accused's signature. The petition was dismissed, and the case was directed to proceed to the next stage of trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case