Government of Gujarat vs VIPULSING @ VIJUBHA KANUSING VAGHELA- DARBAR Advocate - S L SHAIKH — 1/2020

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,294B,506(2),114,. Status: EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION. Next hearing: 16th July 2026.

ATRO - SPECIAL CASE - ATRO

CNR: GJBK180002252020

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Next Hearing

16th July 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1/2020

Filing Date

05-02-2020

Registration No

1/2020

Registration Date

05-02-2020

Court

ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, Deesa

Judge

3-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

FIR Details

FIR Number

171

Police Station

DEESA RURAL POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2019

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 323,294B,506(2),114,
SCHEDULED CASTS AND THE SCHEDULED TRIBES (PREVENTION OF TROCITIES) ACT, 1989 Section 3(1)(R)(S),3(2)5(A)

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. S K JOSHI

Respondent(s)

VIPULSING @ VIJUBHA KANUSING VAGHELA- DARBAR Advocate - S L SHAIKH

VANRAJSING VALSING VAGHELA- DARBAR

Adv. S L SHAIKH

SURAJSING UDESING VAGHELA- DARBAR

Adv. R G DESAI

Hearing History

Judge: 3-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

22-04-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

09-03-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

13-01-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

11-11-2025

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

17-10-2025

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Interim Orders

09-03-2026
ORDER

Case Summary Special Atro Case No 01/2020 This document is primarily an affidavit/statement recorded by the complainant describing allegations of assault and criminal intimidation by multiple accused persons. The complainant provides a detailed narrative of the incident and identifies the accused. However, no final court order granting or denying bail, dismissing or allowing any petition, or adjourning the case is clearly stated in the visible portions of this document. The document ends with the complainant's sworn statement and signature. Any substantive judicial order on the merits appears to be absent or on subsequent pages not fully shown. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Special Atro Case No 01/2020 This document is primarily an affidavit/statement recorded by the complainant describing allegations of assault and criminal intimidation by multiple accused persons. The complainant provides a detailed narrative of the incident and identifies the accused. However, no final court order granting or denying bail, dismissing or allowing any petition, or adjourning the case is clearly stated in the visible portions of this document. The document ends with the complainant's sworn statement and signature. Any substantive judicial order on the merits appears to be absent or on subsequent pages not fully shown. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, Deesa All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case