Government of Gujarat A.S. Sanghvi vs Kuvarji Karshanji Sorathiya — 162/2025
Case under The Building and Other Construction Workers (regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 1996 Section 261(B). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 02nd May 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBK170004132025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
162/2025
Filing Date
22-12-2025
Registration No
162/2025
Registration Date
22-12-2025
Court
LABOUR COURT, PALANPUR
Judge
1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT (JD)
Decision Date
02nd May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat A.S. Sanghvi
Respondent(s)
Kuvarji Karshanji Sorathiya
K.K. Sorathiya
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT (JD)
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 02-05-2026 | Disposed | |
| 08-04-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 10-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 04-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 17-01-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court convicted the accused under the Building and Other Construction Workers Act, 1996 and Gujarat Rules, 2003 for violating labor safety regulations, sentencing him to a fine of ₹2,000 with one month imprisonment in default. The court considered the accused's admission of guilt, first-time offense, family circumstances, and the precedent set in State of Gujarat v. HarChand Thakur (2005) to impose a lenient sentence while emphasizing that such violations pose serious public safety risks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court convicted the accused under the Building and Other Construction Workers Act, 1996 and Gujarat Rules, 2003 for violating labor safety regulations, sentencing him to a fine of ₹2,000 with one month imprisonment in default. The court considered the accused's admission of guilt, first-time offense, family circumstances, and the precedent set in State of Gujarat v. HarChand Thakur (2005) to impose a lenient sentence while emphasizing that such violations pose serious public safety risks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts