Government of Gujarat D. R. Parmar vs Suresh Sonkar — 149/2025
Case under Child Labour (prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986 Section 7(3), 3(1), 7(2), 7(4), 7(5), 9, 10, 5(1). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 14th March 2026.
CR EN - CRIMINAL ENQUIRY
CNR: GJBK170002792025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
149/2025
Filing Date
08-09-2025
Registration No
149/2025
Registration Date
08-09-2025
Court
LABOUR COURT, PALANPUR
Judge
1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT (JD)
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat D. R. Parmar
Respondent(s)
Suresh Sonkar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT (JD)
Disposed
PROCESS TO WITNESSES
PROCESS TO WITNESSES
PROCESS TO WITNESSES
PROCESS TO WITNESSES
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 13-03-2026 | PROCESS TO WITNESSES | |
| 10-03-2026 | PROCESS TO WITNESSES | |
| 10-02-2026 | PROCESS TO WITNESSES | |
| 27-01-2026 | PROCESS TO WITNESSES |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court dismissed the criminal inquiry filed against the respondent organization for alleged violations of the Child and Adolescent Labor Act, finding that despite repeated attempts, the prosecution could not serve process on two accused persons after six years, making continued proceedings against them impractical. The court upheld the lower court's order to proceed with trial against the remaining accused while reserving liberty to file fresh complaints against the unserved accused when their addresses are obtained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court dismissed the criminal inquiry filed against the respondent organization for alleged violations of the Child and Adolescent Labor Act, finding that despite repeated attempts, the prosecution could not serve process on two accused persons after six years, making continued proceedings against them impractical. The court upheld the lower court's order to proceed with trial against the remaining accused while reserving liberty to file fresh complaints against the unserved accused when their addresses are obtained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts