Government of Gujarat D. R. Parmar vs Suresh Sonkar — 149/2025
Case under Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986 Section 7(3), 3(1), 7(2), 7(4), 7(5), 9, 10, 5(1). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 14th March 2026.
CR EN - CRIMINAL ENQUIRY
CNR: GJBK170002792025
Filing Number
149/2025
Filing Date
08-Sep-2025
Registration No
149/2025
Registration Date
08-Sep-2025
Court
LABOUR COURT, PALANPUR
Judge
1-Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Last updated 06-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat D. R. Parmar
Respondent(s)
-
1.Suresh Sonkar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The court dismissed the criminal inquiry filed against the respondent organization for alleged violations of the Child and Adolescent Labor Act, finding that despite repeated attempts, the prosecution could not serve process on two accused persons after six years, making continued proceedings against them impractical. The court upheld the lower court's order to proceed with trial against the remaining accused while reserving liberty to file fresh complaints against the unserved accused when their addresses are obtained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
13-Mar-2026
Process To Witnesses
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
10-Mar-2026
Process To Witnesses
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
10-Feb-2026
Process To Witnesses
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
27-Jan-2026
Process To Witnesses
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
24-Dec-2025
Process To Witnesses
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
12-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
11-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Opponent
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
10-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 149/2025
The court dismissed the criminal inquiry filed against the respondent organization for alleged violations of the Child and Adolescent Labor Act, finding that despite repeated attempts, the prosecution could not serve process on two accused persons after six years, making continued proceedings against them impractical. The court upheld the lower court's order to proceed with trial against the remaining accused while reserving liberty to file fresh complaints against the unserved accused when their addresses are obtained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts