Government Of Gujarat D R Parmar vs Dr. Devin Lachchaji Padhiyar — 4/2026

Case under Minimum Wages Act, 1948 Section 26(D), 26(2), 26(B)(1), 22, 21(4), 21(1). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

CR EN - CRIMINAL ENQUIRY

CNR: GJBK170000152026

Filing Number

4/2026

Filing Date

11-Feb-2026

Registration No

4/2026

Registration Date

11-Feb-2026

Court

LABOUR COURT, PALANPUR

Judge

1-Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 06-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Minimum Wages Act, 1948 Section 26(D), 26(2), 26(B)(1), 22, 21(4), 21(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government Of Gujarat D R Parmar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Dr. Devin Lachchaji Padhiyar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court dismissed the criminal inquiry, holding that despite repeated attempts to serve process on the accused over six years, the prosecution failed to locate them, making further proceedings against those specific accused impractical. The court upheld the lower court's order directing trial to proceed only against the accused who could be served, while reserving liberty to file fresh complaints against the untraceable accused when their addresses are subsequently obtained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  4. 08-Apr-2026

    Process To Witnesses

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Process To Witnesses

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 11-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 4/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the criminal inquiry, holding that despite repeated attempts to serve process on the accused over six years, the prosecution failed to locate them, making further proceedings against those specific accused impractical. The court upheld the lower court's order directing trial to proceed only against the accused who could be served, while reserving liberty to file fresh complaints against the untraceable accused when their addresses are subsequently obtained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case