Government Of Guajarat D R Paramar vs Ishwarbhai J. Patel Advocate - D P CHAUDHARY — 6/2026

Case under Minimum Wages Act, 1948 Section 26(D), 26(2), 26(B)(1), 21(1)(I). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBK170000112026

Filing Number

6/2026

Filing Date

10-Feb-2026

Registration No

6/2026

Registration Date

10-Feb-2026

Court

LABOUR COURT, PALANPUR

Judge

1-Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 06-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Minimum Wages Act, 1948 Section 26(D), 26(2), 26(B)(1), 21(1)(I)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government Of Guajarat D R Paramar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ishwarbhai J. Patel Advocate - D P CHAUDHARY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary The court convicted the accused under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 and related provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act for violating minimum wage regulations. The court found the accused guilty of breaching statutory wage requirements and sentenced him to a fine of ₹8,000 with one month simple imprisonment as default punishment, considering the nature of the offense and principles of judicial discretion established in prior precedents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  6. 07-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  7. 28-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 10-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 6/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The court convicted the accused under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 and related provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act for violating minimum wage regulations. The court found the accused guilty of breaching statutory wage requirements and sentenced him to a fine of ₹8,000 with one month simple imprisonment as default punishment, considering the nature of the offense and principles of judicial discretion established in prior precedents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case