Government of Gujarat D R Parmar vs Jackson car accessories and Car washing — 5/2026

Case under Minimum Wages Act, 1948 Section 26(D). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBK170000102026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

5/2026

Filing Date

10-02-2026

Registration No

5/2026

Registration Date

10-02-2026

Court

LABOUR COURT, PALANPUR

Judge

1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT (JD)

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Acts & Sections

MINIMUM WAGES ACT, 1948 Section 26(D)

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat D R Parmar

Respondent(s)

Jackson car accessories and Car washing

PRAVINSINH DEVISINH IDAVAT

Dilipsinh Dabhi

Hearing History

Judge: 1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT (JD)

14-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

20-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

Summary The court convicted the accused of violating the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 by breaching Rule 26(D) under the 1961 Regulations, as amended by the Gujarat Labor Law Amendment Act 2015. The accused was sentenced to a fine of Rs. 2,000 and directed to deposit the fine with the government; in case of non-payment, the accused shall undergo one month simple imprisonment. The court considered mitigating factors including the accused's family circumstances and employment impact while imposing the minimum statutory penalty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court convicted the accused of violating the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 by breaching Rule 26(D) under the 1961 Regulations, as amended by the Gujarat Labor Law Amendment Act 2015. The accused was sentenced to a fine of Rs. 2,000 and directed to deposit the fine with the government; in case of non-payment, the accused shall undergo one month simple imprisonment. The court considered mitigating factors including the accused's family circumstances and employment impact while imposing the minimum statutory penalty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

LABOUR COURT, PALANPUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case