Government of Gujarat D R parmar vs Jackson car accessories and Car washing — 4/2026

Case under The Child Labour (prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986 Section 12, 16, 7(2), 17. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBK170000092026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

4/2026

Filing Date

10-02-2026

Registration No

4/2026

Registration Date

10-02-2026

Court

LABOUR COURT, PALANPUR

Judge

1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT (JD)

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Acts & Sections

THE CHILD LABOUR (PROHIBITION AND REGULATION) ACT, 1986 Section 12, 16, 7(2), 17

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat D R parmar

Respondent(s)

Jackson car accessories and Car washing

PRAVINSINH DEVISINH IDAVAT

DILIPSINH DABHI

Hearing History

Judge: 1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT (JD)

14-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

20-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

Summary The Palanpur Labour Court convicted the defendant under the Child and Adolescent Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act 1986, Section 14(3)(d) for violating Sections 12, 16, 7(2), and Regulation 17, finding the defendant guilty of employing child labor without proper authorization. The court sentenced the defendant to imprisonment for one month (in default of fine) and imposed a fine of Rs. 10,000, with the court considering the defendant's family circumstances and first-time offense while upholding strict labor protection laws. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Palanpur Labour Court convicted the defendant under the Child and Adolescent Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act 1986, Section 14(3)(d) for violating Sections 12, 16, 7(2), and Regulation 17, finding the defendant guilty of employing child labor without proper authorization. The court sentenced the defendant to imprisonment for one month (in default of fine) and imposed a fine of Rs. 10,000, with the court considering the defendant's family circumstances and first-time offense while upholding strict labor protection laws. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

LABOUR COURT, PALANPUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case