Government of Gujarat D R parmar vs Jackson car accessories and Car washing — 4/2026

Case under The Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986 Section 12, 16, 7(2), 17. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBK170000092026

Filing Number

4/2026

Filing Date

10-Feb-2026

Registration No

4/2026

Registration Date

10-Feb-2026

Court

LABOUR COURT, PALANPUR

Judge

1-Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 06-May-2026

Acts & Sections

The Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986 Section 12, 16, 7(2), 17

Petitioner(s)

1.Government of Gujarat D R parmar

Respondent(s)

1.Jackson car accessories and Car washing
2.PRAVINSINH DEVISINH IDAVAT
3.DILIPSINH DABHI

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
14-Mar-2026

OrderView PDF

Summary The Palanpur Labour Court convicted the defendant under the Child and Adolescent Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act 1986, Section 14(3)(d) for violating Sections 12, 16, 7(2), and Regulation 17, finding the defendant guilty of employing child labor without proper authorization. The court sentenced the defendant to imprisonment for one month (in default of fine) and imposed a fine of Rs. 10,000, with the court considering the defendant's family circumstances and first-time offense while upholding strict labor protection laws. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
14-Mar-2026

Disposed

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
10-Mar-2026

Judgement

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
20-Feb-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
10-Feb-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 4/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Palanpur Labour Court convicted the defendant under the Child and Adolescent Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act 1986, Section 14(3)(d) for violating Sections 12, 16, 7(2), and Regulation 17, finding the defendant guilty of employing child labor without proper authorization. The court sentenced the defendant to imprisonment for one month (in default of fine) and imposed a fine of Rs. 10,000, with the court considering the defendant's family circumstances and first-time offense while upholding strict labor protection laws. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.