VORA SAIFUDIN ALIBHAI vs VANA(VORA) SABBIRBHAI ABBASBHAI Advocate - B B THAKOR — 20/2021

Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,38,. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJBK160019592021

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

27th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

20/2021

Filing Date

10-11-2021

Registration No

20/2021

Registration Date

10-11-2021

Court

TALUKA COURT, SIHORI

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Acts & Sections

SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT, 1963 Section 34,38,

Petitioner(s)

VORA SAIFUDIN ALIBHAI

Adv. R K MANSURI

VORA NAFISABEN NAJMUDDIN HEIRS OF VORA NAJMUDIN ALIBHAI

Adv. R.K.MANSURI

VORA AMARBHAI NAJMUDIN HEIRS OF VORA NAJMUDIN ALIBHAI

Adv. R.K.MANSURI

Respondent(s)

VANA(VORA) SABBIRBHAI ABBASBHAI Advocate - B B THAKOR

VORA FAKRUDIN ALIBHAI

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

06-04-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

23-03-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

09-03-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

23-02-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

02-02-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

10-06-2024
ORDER

Court Order Summary Case: Regular Civil Suit No. 20/2021, Shihor Court, Banaskantha District, Gujarat Outcome: The plaintiff's petition for interim/temporary injunction (under CPC Order 39) has been DISMISSED. The court rejected the plaintiff's request for a temporary restraining order regarding disputed agricultural land in village Totana, Kankarej taluka, finding the plaintiff's case lacks prima facie merit and the balance of convenience favors the defendant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Order Summary Case: Regular Civil Suit No. 20/2021, Shihor Court, Banaskantha District, Gujarat Outcome: The plaintiff's petition for interim/temporary injunction (under CPC Order 39) has been DISMISSED. The court rejected the plaintiff's request for a temporary restraining order regarding disputed agricultural land in village Totana, Kankarej taluka, finding the plaintiff's case lacks prima facie merit and the balance of convenience favors the defendant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, SIHORI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case