POPATJI NANJIJI THAKOR vs LEBAJI KANAJI KOLI Advocate - R K MANSURI — 18/2023

Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 31,34,36,. Status: ISSUES. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJBK160014832023

ISSUES

Next Hearing

08th June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

18/2023

Filing Date

14-07-2023

Registration No

18/2023

Registration Date

14-07-2023

Court

TALUKA COURT, SIHORI

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Acts & Sections

SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT, 1963 Section 31,34,36,

Petitioner(s)

POPATJI NANJIJI THAKOR

Adv. P K JOSHI

BHURIBEN NANJIJI THAKOR

LILABEN NANJIJI THAKOR

PASHIBEN NANJIJI THAKOR

HARKHABEN NANJIJI THAKOR

Adv. P K JOSHI

Respondent(s)

LEBAJI KANAJI KOLI Advocate - R K MANSURI

JAMABEN KANAJI KOLI

BALAJI KANAJI KOLI

PRATAPJI KANAJI KOLI

SATIRAJI KANAJI KOLI

CHHAGANJI KANAJI KOLI

NATHIBEN DAHYAJI KOLI

DINESHJI DAHYAJI KOLI

SOMIBEN DAHYAJI KOLI

GOVARDHNAJI DAHYAJI KOLI

BHANUBEN DAHYAJI KOLI

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

20-04-2026

ISSUES

30-03-2026

ISSUES

09-03-2026

ISSUES

16-02-2026

ISSUES

05-01-2026

ISSUES

Interim Orders

28-04-2025
ORDER

Court Order Summary Case: Regular Civil Suit No. 18/2023, Order No. 05 (Interim Injunction Application) Court: Principal Civil Judge, Sihor, Gujarat Date: 28 April 2025 Outcome: The interim injunction (temporary restraining order) application filed by the plaintiffs seeking relief regarding disputed agricultural land has been DISMISSED. The court rejected the plaintiffs' request for interim injunction, finding that they failed to establish a prima facie case or demonstrate that balance of convenience favors granting such relief. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Order Summary Case: Regular Civil Suit No. 18/2023, Order No. 05 (Interim Injunction Application) Court: Principal Civil Judge, Sihor, Gujarat Date: 28 April 2025 Outcome: The interim injunction (temporary restraining order) application filed by the plaintiffs seeking relief regarding disputed agricultural land has been DISMISSED. The court rejected the plaintiffs' request for interim injunction, finding that they failed to establish a prima facie case or demonstrate that balance of convenience favors granting such relief. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, SIHORI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case