PRAJAPATI MAFABHAI PUNABHAI vs PRAJAPATI HARGOVANBHAI AJABHAI Advocate - R K MANSURI — 27/2015
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 034,038,. Status: FINAL ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJBK160010532015
Next Hearing
27th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
27/2015
Filing Date
10-12-2015
Registration No
27/2015
Registration Date
10-12-2015
Court
TALUKA COURT, SIHORI
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PRAJAPATI MAFABHAI PUNABHAI
Adv. M C PARMAR
PRAJAPATI HARGOVANBHAI PUNABHAI
Adv. M C PARMAR
PRAJAPATI TRIBHOVABHAI PUNABHAI
Adv. M C PARMAR
Respondent(s)
PRAJAPATI HARGOVANBHAI AJABHAI Advocate - R K MANSURI
PRAJAPATI JESANGBHAI AJABHAI
Adv. J R SUMRA
PRAJAPATI CHAMANBHAI AJABHAI
PRAJAPATI MANABHAI AJABHAI
PRAJAPATI SAGRAMBHAI HARIBHAI
PRAJAPATI DASARATHBHAI JIVANBHAI
PRAJAPATI VIJYABEN JIVANBHAI
PRAJAPATI RAMESHBHAI BABABHAI
PRAJAPATI JAYANTIBHAI BABABHAI
PRAJAPATI NARMADABEN BABABHAI
PRAJAPATI VALIBEN BABABHAI
PRAJAPATI SHAMBHUBHAI JOITABHAI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
ISSUES
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 09-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 16-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 12-01-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 22-12-2025 | ISSUES |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case: Revenue Dispute Petition No. 27/15 | Court: Principal Civil Court, Sihor Outcome: Both petitions dismissed—the plaintiffs' interim relief plea (Mark 5) and the defendants' counter-claim interim relief plea (Mark 17) are rejected. The court found insufficient grounds to grant interim injunctions to either party, as the case involves disputed revenue records with ongoing parallel proceedings that must be resolved on their merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case: Revenue Dispute Petition No. 27/15 | Court: Principal Civil Court, Sihor Outcome: Both petitions dismissed—the plaintiffs' interim relief plea (Mark 5) and the defendants' counter-claim interim relief plea (Mark 17) are rejected. The court found insufficient grounds to grant interim injunctions to either party, as the case involves disputed revenue records with ongoing parallel proceedings that must be resolved on their merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts