DESAI (RABARI) LILUBEN RATNABHAI W/O VIRBHNBHAI RUPABHAI RABARI vs DESAI (RABARI) VIRBHNBHAI RUPABHAI Advocate - R V CHAUDHARI — 112/2024
Case under The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 12. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 08th April 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJBK160006742024
Filing Number
112/2024
Filing Date
29-Apr-2024
Registration No
112/2024
Registration Date
29-Apr-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, SIHORI
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
08-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 06-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DESAI (RABARI) LILUBEN RATNABHAI W/O VIRBHNBHAI RUPABHAI RABARI
Adv. R K MANSURI
Respondent(s)
-
1.DESAI (RABARI) VIRBHNBHAI RUPABHAI Advocate - R V CHAUDHARI
-
2.DESAI RUPABHAI VISABHAI
-
3.DESAI DEVALBEN W/O RUPABHAI VISABHAI
-
4.DESAI VALAMBEN D/O RUPABHAI VISABHAI
-
5.DESAI VINABEN D/O RUPABHAI VISABHAI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary The court partially granted the applicant's petition under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The judge found that while domestic violence was not conclusively proven due to lack of documentary evidence, the applicant (wife) is entitled to maintenance of ₹3,500 per month from her husband (respondent No. 1) and ₹1,000 as litigation costs, recognizing the husband's financial capacity and the applicant's maintenance needs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Opponent
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Opponent
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Opponent
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Opponent
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Opponent
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Opponent
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Opponent
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Opponent
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Opponent
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Jun-2025
Evidence Of Opponent
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-May-2025
Evidence Of Opponent
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-May-2025
Evidence Of Opponent
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Apr-2025
Evidence Of Opponent
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-Mar-2025
Evidence Of Applicant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-Feb-2025
Evidence Of Applicant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Jan-2025
Evidence Of Applicant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Dec-2024
Evidence Of Applicant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Nov-2024
Evidence Of Applicant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Oct-2024
Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
31-Aug-2024
Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Aug-2024
Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Jul-2024
Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Jul-2024
Process To Opponent
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-Jun-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Apr-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 112/2024
Summary The court partially granted the applicant's petition under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The judge found that while domestic violence was not conclusively proven due to lack of documentary evidence, the applicant (wife) is entitled to maintenance of ₹3,500 per month from her husband (respondent No. 1) and ₹1,000 as litigation costs, recognizing the husband's financial capacity and the applicant's maintenance needs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts