DESAI (RABARI) LILUBEN RATNABHAI W/O VIRBHNBHAI RUPABHAI RABARI vs DESAI (RABARI) VIRBHNBHAI RUPABHAI Advocate - R V CHAUDHARI — 112/2024

Case under The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 12. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 08th April 2026.

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJBK160006742024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

112/2024

Filing Date

29-04-2024

Registration No

112/2024

Registration Date

29-04-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, SIHORI

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

08th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

THE PROTECTION OF WOMEN FROM DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT, 2005 Section 12

Petitioner(s)

DESAI (RABARI) LILUBEN RATNABHAI W/O VIRBHNBHAI RUPABHAI RABARI

Adv. R K MANSURI

Respondent(s)

DESAI (RABARI) VIRBHNBHAI RUPABHAI Advocate - R V CHAUDHARI

DESAI RUPABHAI VISABHAI

DESAI DEVALBEN W/O RUPABHAI VISABHAI

DESAI VALAMBEN D/O RUPABHAI VISABHAI

DESAI VINABEN D/O RUPABHAI VISABHAI

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

08-04-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

EVIDENCE OF OPPONENT

04-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF OPPONENT

24-12-2025

EVIDENCE OF OPPONENT

19-11-2025

EVIDENCE OF OPPONENT

Final Orders / Judgements

08-04-2026
ORDER

Summary The court partially granted the applicant's petition under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The judge found that while domestic violence was not conclusively proven due to lack of documentary evidence, the applicant (wife) is entitled to maintenance of ₹3,500 per month from her husband (respondent No. 1) and ₹1,000 as litigation costs, recognizing the husband's financial capacity and the applicant's maintenance needs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court partially granted the applicant's petition under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The judge found that while domestic violence was not conclusively proven due to lack of documentary evidence, the applicant (wife) is entitled to maintenance of ₹3,500 per month from her husband (respondent No. 1) and ₹1,000 as litigation costs, recognizing the husband's financial capacity and the applicant's maintenance needs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, SIHORI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case