DESAI (RABARI) LILUBEN RATNABHAI W/O VIRBHNBHAI RUPABHAI RABARI vs DESAI (RABARI) VIRBHNBHAI RUPABHAI Advocate - R V CHAUDHARI — 112/2024

Case under The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 12. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 08th April 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJBK160006742024

Filing Number

112/2024

Filing Date

29-Apr-2024

Registration No

112/2024

Registration Date

29-Apr-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, SIHORI

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

08-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 06-May-2026

Acts & Sections

The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DESAI (RABARI) LILUBEN RATNABHAI W/O VIRBHNBHAI RUPABHAI RABARI

    Adv. R K MANSURI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DESAI (RABARI) VIRBHNBHAI RUPABHAI Advocate - R V CHAUDHARI

  2. 2.DESAI RUPABHAI VISABHAI

  3. 3.DESAI DEVALBEN W/O RUPABHAI VISABHAI

  4. 4.DESAI VALAMBEN D/O RUPABHAI VISABHAI

  5. 5.DESAI VINABEN D/O RUPABHAI VISABHAI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The court partially granted the applicant's petition under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The judge found that while domestic violence was not conclusively proven due to lack of documentary evidence, the applicant (wife) is entitled to maintenance of ₹3,500 per month from her husband (respondent No. 1) and ₹1,000 as litigation costs, recognizing the husband's financial capacity and the applicant's maintenance needs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Opponent

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 04-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Opponent

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 24-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Opponent

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 19-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Opponent

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 28-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Opponent

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 24-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Opponent

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 03-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Opponent

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 22-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Opponent

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 18-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Opponent

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 20-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Opponent

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 23-May-2025

    Evidence Of Opponent

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 02-May-2025

    Evidence Of Opponent

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 03-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Opponent

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 01-Mar-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 01-Feb-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 04-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 07-Dec-2024

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 08-Nov-2024

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 04-Oct-2024

    Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 31-Aug-2024

    Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 07-Aug-2024

    Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 24-Jul-2024

    Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 06-Jul-2024

    Process To Opponent

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  27. 01-Jun-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  28. 29-Apr-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 112/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court partially granted the applicant's petition under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The judge found that while domestic violence was not conclusively proven due to lack of documentary evidence, the applicant (wife) is entitled to maintenance of ₹3,500 per month from her husband (respondent No. 1) and ₹1,000 as litigation costs, recognizing the husband's financial capacity and the applicant's maintenance needs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case