MARHUM MASABHAI TRIKAMBHAI PARMARNA VARASDARO-RAVABHAI MASABHAI PARMAR vs MARHUM ISMAIL ALI GHANCHI NA VARASDARO Advocate - J P AAL — 10/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9,. Status: DEFENDANT EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 08th May 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJBK140006702022
Next Hearing
08th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
10/2022
Filing Date
16-07-2022
Registration No
10/2022
Registration Date
16-07-2022
Court
TALUKA COURT, BHABHAR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MARHUM MASABHAI TRIKAMBHAI PARMARNA VARASDARO-RAVABHAI MASABHAI PARMAR
Adv. V V PATEL
RAMESHBHAI MASABHAI PARMAR
Adv. V V PATEL
AMRATBHAI MASABHAI PARMAR
Adv. V V PATEL
Respondent(s)
MARHUM ISMAIL ALI GHANCHI NA VARASDARO Advocate - J P AAL
GHANCHI FIRDOSHIBEN AKBARBHAI
Adv. R N CHAUDHARI
PRAMUKH SHREE/ MUKHAYA ADHIKARISHREE
Adv. D D VYAS
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE | |
| 04-04-2026 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE | |
| 10-03-2026 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE | |
| 09-03-2026 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE | |
| 06-03-2026 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary: The suit filed by the plaintiff seeking declaration, cancellation of sale deed, and perpetual injunction has been dismissed for want of prosecution. The court found that despite being granted sufficient opportunities and an adjournment on 29/03/24, the plaintiff and his advocate failed to appear or produce any evidence on the hearing date, demonstrating lack of interest in proceeding with the matter. No order regarding costs was passed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The suit filed by the plaintiff seeking declaration, cancellation of sale deed, and perpetual injunction has been dismissed for want of prosecution. The court found that despite being granted sufficient opportunities and an adjournment on 29/03/24, the plaintiff and his advocate failed to appear or produce any evidence on the hearing date, demonstrating lack of interest in proceeding with the matter. No order regarding costs was passed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts