Government of Gujarat vs VAHJIJI RAMCHANDJI VAGHELA (THAKOR) Advocate - C N DAVE — 332/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,324,325,294(b),506(2),114. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 22nd April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBK140004222024

Filing Number

332/2024

Filing Date

10-May-2024

Registration No

332/2024

Registration Date

10-May-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, BHABHAR

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

22-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11195007240041

Police Station

BHABHAR POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 323,324,325,294(b),506(2),114
Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VAHJIJI RAMCHANDJI VAGHELA (THAKOR) Advocate - C N DAVE

  2. 2.GANPATBHAI VAHJIBHAI THAKOR (VAGHELA)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 22-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Court Judgment Summary The Bharat Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted two accused of charges under IPC Sections 323, 324, 325, and related provisions due to insufficient evidence. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the criminal charges against the defendants beyond reasonable doubt, as the victim's testimony and supporting evidence were not adequate or credible. Consequently, the defendants were acquitted, and charges under IPC Sections 323, 324, 325, 294(b), 506(2), and 135 IPC were dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 22-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 17-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 10-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 07-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 10-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 09-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 08-Jan-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 18-Dec-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 03-Dec-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 19-Nov-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 06-Nov-2025

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 06-Oct-2025

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 01-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 29-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 24-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 27-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 29-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 02-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 04-Mar-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 04-Feb-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 07-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 09-Dec-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 11-Nov-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 08-Oct-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  27. 10-Sep-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  28. 06-Aug-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  29. 09-Jul-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  30. 19-Jun-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  31. 15-Jun-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  32. 10-May-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 332/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Court Judgment Summary The Bharat Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted two accused of charges under IPC Sections 323, 324, 325, and related provisions due to insufficient evidence. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the criminal charges against the defendants beyond reasonable doubt, as the victim's testimony and supporting evidence were not adequate or credible. Consequently, the defendants were acquitted, and charges under IPC Sections 323, 324, 325, 294(b), 506(2), and 135 IPC were dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case