Government of Gujarat vs VAHJIJI RAMCHANDJI VAGHELA (THAKOR) Advocate - C N DAVE — 332/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,324,325,294(b),506(2),114,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 22nd April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBK140004222024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
332/2024
Filing Date
10-05-2024
Registration No
332/2024
Registration Date
10-05-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, BHABHAR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
22nd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11195007240041
Police Station
BHABHAR POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
VAHJIJI RAMCHANDJI VAGHELA (THAKOR) Advocate - C N DAVE
GANPATBHAI VAHJIBHAI THAKOR (VAGHELA)
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 17-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 10-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 07-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 10-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Judgment Summary The Bharat Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted two accused of charges under IPC Sections 323, 324, 325, and related provisions due to insufficient evidence. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the criminal charges against the defendants beyond reasonable doubt, as the victim's testimony and supporting evidence were not adequate or credible. Consequently, the defendants were acquitted, and charges under IPC Sections 323, 324, 325, 294(b), 506(2), and 135 IPC were dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Judgment Summary The Bharat Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted two accused of charges under IPC Sections 323, 324, 325, and related provisions due to insufficient evidence. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the criminal charges against the defendants beyond reasonable doubt, as the victim's testimony and supporting evidence were not adequate or credible. Consequently, the defendants were acquitted, and charges under IPC Sections 323, 324, 325, 294(b), 506(2), and 135 IPC were dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts