CHAVDA JESUNGJI CHAMANJI vs MANEGAR SHRI BANASKANTHA JILLA MADHYASTH SAHKARI BANK, BHABHAR SHAKHA — 7/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 223. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 04th May 2026.
CR EN - CRIMINAL ENQUIRY
CNR: GJBK140002892026
Filing Number
7/2026
Filing Date
23-Feb-2026
Registration No
7/2026
Registration Date
23-Feb-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, BHABHAR
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 06-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.CHAVDA JESUNGJI CHAMANJI
Adv. B K JOSHI
Respondent(s)
-
1.MANEGAR SHRI BANASKANTHA JILLA MADHYASTH SAHKARI BANK, BHABHAR SHAKHA
-
2.PATEL JAGMALBHAI DHUDABHAI
-
3.CHAUDHARI MANSUNGBHAI JUNIOR INS.BANA BANK BHABHAR SHAKHA
-
4.CHAUDHARI KANJIBHAI SENI-INS. BANASBANK BHABHAR
-
5.CHAVDA VIRENDRASINH B. JUNI.INS, BANAS BANK BHABHAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
OrderView PDF
The court dismissed the petition as the investigation was already pending before the police, making further court intervention unnecessary. The court noted that the accused's FIR registration and subsequent police inquiry were valid, and therefore no inquiry order from the court was required in this matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-May-2026
Evidence Of Complainant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Apr-2026
Evidence Of Complainant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Apr-2026
Evidence Of Complainant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Apr-2026
Evidence Of Complainant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Complainant
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 7/2026
The court dismissed the petition as the investigation was already pending before the police, making further court intervention unnecessary. The court noted that the accused's FIR registration and subsequent police inquiry were valid, and therefore no inquiry order from the court was required in this matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts