THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs DILIPBHAI ASHOKBHAI PUROHIT Advocate - K P PUROHIT — 1667/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281,106(1). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 23rd March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBK130020242025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1667/2025
Filing Date
30-12-2025
Registration No
1667/2025
Registration Date
30-12-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT-DANTIWADA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
502
Police Station
PANTHAWADA POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP, B H PARADIYA
Respondent(s)
DILIPBHAI ASHOKBHAI PUROHIT Advocate - K P PUROHIT
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 16-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 27-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 30-12-2025 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary Case: CC.No.1667/2025 | Court: First Class Magistrate, Dantiwada, Gujarat | Date: 23/03/2026 The court acquitted the accused of charges under BNS 2023 (Section 281, 106(1)) and MV Act (Section 177, 184) in a hit-and-run case involving a fatal motorcycle accident. The prosecution failed to provide convincing evidence linking the accused to the crime, as witness testimonies were inconsistent and crucial documentary evidence was lacking. The court found no reliable proof of rash or negligent driving causing death. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary Case: CC.No.1667/2025 | Court: First Class Magistrate, Dantiwada, Gujarat | Date: 23/03/2026 The court acquitted the accused of charges under BNS 2023 (Section 281, 106(1)) and MV Act (Section 177, 184) in a hit-and-run case involving a fatal motorcycle accident. The prosecution failed to provide convincing evidence linking the accused to the crime, as witness testimonies were inconsistent and crucial documentary evidence was lacking. The court found no reliable proof of rash or negligent driving causing death. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts