THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs DINESHBHAI NENAJI PRAJAPATI — 438/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B),85(1). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBK130004892026

Filing Number

438/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

438/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT-DANTIWADA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

289

Police Station

PANTHAWADA POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B),85(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DINESHBHAI NENAJI PRAJAPATI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    The Dantiivada Sessions Court convicted Dineshbhai Nenaji Prajapati under Section 56(1)B of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, finding him guilty of beating a donkey while loading it with goods. The court sentenced him to pay a fine of ₹200, or in default, undergo one day's simple imprisonment, and ordered confiscation of the animal for six months, considering his first offense, remorse, and poor economic condition as mitigating factors. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 438/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Dantiivada Sessions Court convicted Dineshbhai Nenaji Prajapati under Section 56(1)B of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, finding him guilty of beating a donkey while loading it with goods. The court sentenced him to pay a fine of ₹200, or in default, undergo one day's simple imprisonment, and ordered confiscation of the animal for six months, considering his first offense, remorse, and poor economic condition as mitigating factors. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case