THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs PADAMSINH ISHVARSINH RATHOD — 437/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B),85(1). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBK130004882026
Filing Number
437/2026
Filing Date
10-Mar-2026
Registration No
437/2026
Registration Date
10-Mar-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT-DANTIWADA
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 06-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
130
Police Station
PANTHAWADA POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.PADAMSINH ISHVARSINH RATHOD
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
The court convicted defendant Padamsinh Ishvarsinh Rathod under IPC Section 56(1)B and sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 200, with one day's simple imprisonment as default punishment. The court considered mitigating circumstances including the defendant's confession, first-time offense, poor economic status, family dependence, and remorse, thereby imposing a lenient sentence instead of the maximum prescribed punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 437/2026
The court convicted defendant Padamsinh Ishvarsinh Rathod under IPC Section 56(1)B and sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 200, with one day's simple imprisonment as default punishment. The court considered mitigating circumstances including the defendant's confession, first-time offense, poor economic status, family dependence, and remorse, thereby imposing a lenient sentence instead of the maximum prescribed punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts