THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs PADAMSINH ISHVARSINH RATHOD — 437/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B),85(1). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBK130004882026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
437/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
437/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT-DANTIWADA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
130
Police Station
PANTHAWADA POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
PADAMSINH ISHVARSINH RATHOD
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court convicted defendant Padamsinh Ishvarsinh Rathod under IPC Section 56(1)B and sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 200, with one day's simple imprisonment as default punishment. The court considered mitigating circumstances including the defendant's confession, first-time offense, poor economic status, family dependence, and remorse, thereby imposing a lenient sentence instead of the maximum prescribed punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court convicted defendant Padamsinh Ishvarsinh Rathod under IPC Section 56(1)B and sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 200, with one day's simple imprisonment as default punishment. The court considered mitigating circumstances including the defendant's confession, first-time offense, poor economic status, family dependence, and remorse, thereby imposing a lenient sentence instead of the maximum prescribed punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts