THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs PRAVINJI RANCHODJI DHEPA Advocate - V I LODNA — 436/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(F). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 25th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBK130004872026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
436/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
436/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT-DANTIWADA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
PRAVINJI RANCHODJI DHEPA Advocate - V I LODNA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 23-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 10-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted the accused in this case under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, Section 65(f) for illegal possession of country-made liquor. The court found that while illicit liquor was recovered from the accused's field hut, the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt due to insufficient and contradictory evidence, including the absence of proper panchnama witnesses and lack of identification of the accused at the recovery site. The judgment upheld criminal jurisprudence principles requiring reliable corroborating evidence for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted the accused in this case under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, Section 65(f) for illegal possession of country-made liquor. The court found that while illicit liquor was recovered from the accused's field hut, the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt due to insufficient and contradictory evidence, including the absence of proper panchnama witnesses and lack of identification of the accused at the recovery site. The judgment upheld criminal jurisprudence principles requiring reliable corroborating evidence for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts