THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs SURESHBHAI SAVASHIBHAI MALOTARIYA — 435/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 23rd March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBK130004862026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
435/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
435/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT-DANTIWADA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
43
Police Station
PANTHAWADA POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
SURESHBHAI SAVASHIBHAI MALOTARIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Principal Civil Judge & J.M.F.C. Court of Dantiwada acquitted the accused (Sureshbhai Savshibhai Malotriaya) under Section 65(A) of the Gujarat Excise Act, 1949, finding the prosecution's case based on unreliable witness testimony. The court noted that the panchnama (official record) was conducted without proper procedure, as the witnesses denied their presence and the police evidence lacked corroboration. The accused's detention was deemed unsustained, and the case was dismissed as the prosecution failed to prove the charge of possessing 500ml of country liquor without permit beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Principal Civil Judge & J.M.F.C. Court of Dantiwada acquitted the accused (Sureshbhai Savshibhai Malotriaya) under Section 65(A) of the Gujarat Excise Act, 1949, finding the prosecution's case based on unreliable witness testimony. The court noted that the panchnama (official record) was conducted without proper procedure, as the witnesses denied their presence and the police evidence lacked corroboration. The accused's detention was deemed unsustained, and the case was dismissed as the prosecution failed to prove the charge of possessing 500ml of country liquor without permit beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts