THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs PRAKASHBHAI SONAJI BHAT — 434/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 23rd March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBK130004852026
Filing Number
434/2026
Filing Date
10-Mar-2026
Registration No
434/2026
Registration Date
10-Mar-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT-DANTIWADA
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
23-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 06-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
79
Police Station
PANTHAWADA POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.PRAKASHBHAI SONAJI BHAT
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary Court Decision: The Principal Civil Judge & JMFC, Dantiwada acquitted the accused Prakashbhai Sonaji Bhat of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 (Section 65-A). The court found that while the prosecution alleged possession of 01 liter of country liquor worth Rs. 200 without proper permit, the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt due to insufficient and unreliable witness testimony. Key Reasoning: The court noted that the panchanama (official record) lacked proper corroboration from credible witnesses, and the police witnesses' statements were contradicted and inadequately supported. The court emphasized that without reliable and consistent evidence meeting legal standards, the accused could not be convicted despite the seizure of liquor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 434/2026
Case Summary Court Decision: The Principal Civil Judge & JMFC, Dantiwada acquitted the accused Prakashbhai Sonaji Bhat of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 (Section 65-A). The court found that while the prosecution alleged possession of 01 liter of country liquor worth Rs. 200 without proper permit, the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt due to insufficient and unreliable witness testimony. Key Reasoning: The court noted that the panchanama (official record) lacked proper corroboration from credible witnesses, and the police witnesses' statements were contradicted and inadequately supported. The court emphasized that without reliable and consistent evidence meeting legal standards, the accused could not be convicted despite the seizure of liquor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts