THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs JORAVARSINH MAFATSINH VAGHELA — 432/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBK130004832026

Filing Number

432/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

432/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT-DANTIWADA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

146

Police Station

DANTIWADA POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JORAVARSINH MAFATSINH VAGHELA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Court Decision Summary Case: C.C. No. 432/2026 (Dantiwada, Gujarat) Decision: The court acquitted the accused under Section 271 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (corresponding to Section 65 of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949) regarding illegal possession of 4 liters of country liquor worth ₹800. The court found insufficient corroborating evidence due to the panch (witness) failing to authenticate the recovery memorandum, and the police evidence alone was deemed unreliable without independent witness testimony. The accused was discharged as a student under Section 480 of the BNS, 2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 432/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary Case: C.C. No. 432/2026 (Dantiwada, Gujarat) Decision: The court acquitted the accused under Section 271 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (corresponding to Section 65 of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949) regarding illegal possession of 4 liters of country liquor worth ₹800. The court found insufficient corroborating evidence due to the panch (witness) failing to authenticate the recovery memorandum, and the police evidence alone was deemed unreliable without independent witness testimony. The accused was discharged as a student under Section 480 of the BNS, 2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case