THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs CHAMPAKBHAI MOTIBHAI MAKWANA — 430/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 23rd March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBK130004812026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
430/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
430/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT-DANTIWADA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
184
Police Station
DANTIWADA POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
CHAMPAKBHAI MOTIBHAI MAKWANA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Dantiwada JMFC court acquitted the accused under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 (Section 65-A) for possession of unlicensed alcohol found during a police patrol. The court found the prosecution's case failed due to insufficient witness testimony—the panchnama (official record) lacked proper corroboration, and the investigating officer could not establish the chain of custody or provide credible supporting evidence to prove the guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Dantiwada JMFC court acquitted the accused under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 (Section 65-A) for possession of unlicensed alcohol found during a police patrol. The court found the prosecution's case failed due to insufficient witness testimony—the panchnama (official record) lacked proper corroboration, and the investigating officer could not establish the chain of custody or provide credible supporting evidence to prove the guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts