THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs GALABHAI VIRMAJI KUMRECHA — 428/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B),85(1). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBK130004792026
Filing Number
428/2026
Filing Date
10-Mar-2026
Registration No
428/2026
Registration Date
10-Mar-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT-DANTIWADA
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 06-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
172
Police Station
PANTHAWADA POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.GALABHAI VIRMAJI KUMRECHA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
The court convicted Gamanbhai Virmaji Kumrecha under Section 66(1)(b) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act for committing an offense against a minor, but imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 200 fine instead of rigorous imprisonment, considering his impoverished background, first-time offender status, family circumstances, and confession. The court applied the principles established by the Gujarat High Court that allow for reduced sentences when sufficient mitigating circumstances are present. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 428/2026
The court convicted Gamanbhai Virmaji Kumrecha under Section 66(1)(b) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act for committing an offense against a minor, but imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 200 fine instead of rigorous imprisonment, considering his impoverished background, first-time offender status, family circumstances, and confession. The court applied the principles established by the Gujarat High Court that allow for reduced sentences when sufficient mitigating circumstances are present. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts