THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs ASHOKBHAI JIBHAJI GOVALANI — 425/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B),85(1). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBK130004762026

Filing Number

425/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

425/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT-DANTIWADA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

676

Police Station

PANTHAWADA POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B),85(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ASHOKBHAI JIBHAJI GOVALANI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    The Dantiliwada Court convicted Ashokbhai Jibhaji Govlani under Section 56(1)B of the Prohibition Act for illegal possession and sale of liquor, sentencing him to pay a fine of ₹200 with one day simple imprisonment as default punishment. The court considered mitigating factors including his confession, poverty, family dependency, first-time offense, and remorse while imposing a lenient sentence below the statutory minimum. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 425/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Dantiliwada Court convicted Ashokbhai Jibhaji Govlani under Section 56(1)B of the Prohibition Act for illegal possession and sale of liquor, sentencing him to pay a fine of ₹200 with one day simple imprisonment as default punishment. The court considered mitigating factors including his confession, poverty, family dependency, first-time offense, and remorse while imposing a lenient sentence below the statutory minimum. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case