THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs BHERUSINH AMTHUSINH VAGHELA Advocate - A R MATHUR — 417/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(f). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 18th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBK130004672026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
417/2026
Filing Date
09-03-2026
Registration No
417/2026
Registration Date
09-03-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT-DANTIWADA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
90
Police Station
DANTIWADA POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
BHERUSINH AMTHUSINH VAGHELA Advocate - A R MATHUR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary Case: Criminal Case No. 417/2026, Dantiwada Court, Gujarat Decision: The court acquitted the accused (Bheru Singh Amthu Singh Waghela) of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, Section 65(f), finding the prosecution's case not proven beyond reasonable doubt. The court ruled that while illegal liquor was recovered during police patrol, the prosecution failed to establish a credible and trustworthy chain of evidence, as the panchnama (seizure record) witnesses contradicted the prosecution's claims and the police evidence lacked corroboration from independent witnesses present at the crime scene. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case: Criminal Case No. 417/2026, Dantiwada Court, Gujarat Decision: The court acquitted the accused (Bheru Singh Amthu Singh Waghela) of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, Section 65(f), finding the prosecution's case not proven beyond reasonable doubt. The court ruled that while illegal liquor was recovered during police patrol, the prosecution failed to establish a credible and trustworthy chain of evidence, as the panchnama (seizure record) witnesses contradicted the prosecution's claims and the police evidence lacked corroboration from independent witnesses present at the crime scene. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts