THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs BHERUSINH AMTHUSINH VAGHELA Advocate - A R MATHUR — 417/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(f). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBK130004672026

Filing Number

417/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

417/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT-DANTIWADA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

90

Police Station

DANTIWADA POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(f)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BHERUSINH AMTHUSINH VAGHELA Advocate - A R MATHUR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary Case: Criminal Case No. 417/2026, Dantiwada Court, Gujarat Decision: The court acquitted the accused (Bheru Singh Amthu Singh Waghela) of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, Section 65(f), finding the prosecution's case not proven beyond reasonable doubt. The court ruled that while illegal liquor was recovered during police patrol, the prosecution failed to establish a credible and trustworthy chain of evidence, as the panchnama (seizure record) witnesses contradicted the prosecution's claims and the police evidence lacked corroboration from independent witnesses present at the crime scene. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 417/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Case: Criminal Case No. 417/2026, Dantiwada Court, Gujarat Decision: The court acquitted the accused (Bheru Singh Amthu Singh Waghela) of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949, Section 65(f), finding the prosecution's case not proven beyond reasonable doubt. The court ruled that while illegal liquor was recovered during police patrol, the prosecution failed to establish a credible and trustworthy chain of evidence, as the panchnama (seizure record) witnesses contradicted the prosecution's claims and the police evidence lacked corroboration from independent witnesses present at the crime scene. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case