THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs DINESHBHAI KALAJI MADADA Advocate - V I LODNA — 416/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBK130004662026

Filing Number

416/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

416/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT-DANTIWADA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

169

Police Station

PANTHAWADA POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DINESHBHAI KALAJI MADADA Advocate - V I LODNA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary The Dantiwada court acquitted the accused under Section 271 of the Indian Civil Security Code 2023 (BNSS) for illegally possessing 01 liter of petrol without a valid permit, as the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court found critical gaps in the police investigation, including the absence of the mandatory panchnama (seizure record) conducted in the accused's presence and lack of credible witness testimony supporting the prosecution's charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 416/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Dantiwada court acquitted the accused under Section 271 of the Indian Civil Security Code 2023 (BNSS) for illegally possessing 01 liter of petrol without a valid permit, as the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court found critical gaps in the police investigation, including the absence of the mandatory panchnama (seizure record) conducted in the accused's presence and lack of credible witness testimony supporting the prosecution's charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case