THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs BAHADURBHAI BALVANTJI DHEPA Advocate - V I LODNA — 415/2026

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA,116(B). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 18th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBK130004652026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

415/2026

Filing Date

09-03-2026

Registration No

415/2026

Registration Date

09-03-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT-DANTIWADA

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

18th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

158

Police Station

DANTIWADA POLICE STATION - BANASKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65AA,116(B)

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

BAHADURBHAI BALVANTJI DHEPA Advocate - V I LODNA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

18-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

Final Orders / Judgements

18-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The court acquitted the accused Bahadurbhai Balvantji Thakor of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 (Sections 65(A) and 116(B)), finding that while foreign liquor bottles were recovered from his possession during police patrol, the prosecution failed to provide sufficient corroborating witness evidence and proper investigation. The court held that the panchnama (official record) lacked credible witness testimony to establish the case beyond reasonable doubt, and consequently the charge sheet could not be sustained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted the accused Bahadurbhai Balvantji Thakor of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 (Sections 65(A) and 116(B)), finding that while foreign liquor bottles were recovered from his possession during police patrol, the prosecution failed to provide sufficient corroborating witness evidence and proper investigation. The court held that the panchnama (official record) lacked credible witness testimony to establish the case beyond reasonable doubt, and consequently the charge sheet could not be sustained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT-DANTIWADA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case